Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Radiother Oncol. 2022 Jan 3;167:226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.040

Table 3.

Performance of predictive models for late grade ≥2 genitourinary toxicity after conventionally-fractionated radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV F1 Score AUC
Prediction of Toxicity after CF-RT
Random Forest 0.77 0.80 0.42 0.95 0.54 0.78
Elastic Net 0.59 0.96 0.71 0.93 0.65 0.76
Boosted Trees 0.65 0.97 0.79 0.94 0.71 0.81
Prediction of Toxicity after SBRT
Random Forest 0.86 0.76 0.39 0.97 0.53 0.81
Elastic Net 0.79 0.92 0.65 0.96 0.71 0.87
Boosted Trees 0.71 0.90 0.56 0.95 0.63 0.81

AUC, area under the curve; -RT, conventionally fractionated RT; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; SBRT, stereotactic body radiotherapy.