Table 12.
Four QCF alternatives ranking result based on S, R and Q value.
| Alternative | The proposed integrated framework | TOPSIS-based method | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S value | R value | Q value | Ranking by S/R/Q | RC value by the TOPSIS steps | Ranking by RC | |
| A1-PAFF | 0.892 | 0.164 | 1 | 4 | 0.492 | 4 |
| A2-ILF | 0.513 | 0.155 | 0.563 | 3 | 0.523 | 3 |
| A3-PF | 0.370 | 0.153 | 0.420 | 2 | 0.758 | 2 |
| A4-ABCF | 0.319 | 0.119 | 0 | 1 | 0.952 | 1 |