Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 28;126(7):1067–1081. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01675-5

Table 1.

Case–control studies.

Publication Population, dataset Period Study design Selection Cases average age Controls average age Age-adjustment Gene Considered PVs % PVs located in BRCA2 OCCR Cases PV carriers/total (%) Controls PV carriers/total (%) OR (95% CI)a
Johannesdottir [1] Iceland 1983–1992 Cases vs controls from the same population Cases: men diagnosed with PCa at age <65 at a single clinic (University Hospital of Iceland). Controls: participants in an unrelated public health study. Not stated (all <65) Not stated None BRCA2 c.771_775del 0% by design 2/75 (2.67%) 2/499 (0.40%) 6.6 (0.81–56.9)
Hubert [3] Israel Not stated Cases vs controls from the same population Cases: unselected men diagnosed with PCa at a single clinic (Sharett Institute, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital). Controls: recruited from homes for the elderly. Median: 71 Median: 72 None, but cases and controls were of comparable ages BRCA1 c.68_69delAG 2/87 (2.30%) 2/87 (2.30%) Not reported
BRCA2 c.5946delT 100% by design 1/87 (1.15%) 1/87 (1.15%) Not reported
Vazina [4] Israel 1998 Cases vs historical controls Cases: unselected men diagnosed with PCa at three clinics (Rabin, Sheba or the Wolfson Medical Centers). Controls: historical US Ashkenazi controls [50]. Median: 66 Not stated (historical controls) None BRCA1 c.68_69delAG 4/87 (4.60%) 61/5318 (1.15%) Not reported
BRCA2 c.5946delT 100% by design 1/86 (1.16%) 59/5087(1.16%) Not reported
Giusti [6] Israel 1994–1995 Cases vs historical controls Cases: unselected men diagnosed with PCa at 16 clinics. Controls: historical controls from the US Ashkenazi population [50] and an Israeli colorectal cancer case–control study [51]. Mean: 73.6 Not stated (historical controls) None BRCA1 c.68_69delAG and c.5266dupC 16/940 (1.70%) 11/1344 (0.82%) Not reported
BRCA2 c.5946delT 100% by design 14/940 (1.49%) 10/1344 (0.74%) 2.02 (0.89–4.56)
Hamel [7]b Canadian Ashkenazi 1991–2002 Cases vs historical controls Cases: unselected Ashkenazi men diagnosed with PCa at three clinics in Montreal. Controls: historical controls from five studies with Ashkenazi general population or study control groups. Mean: 67.9 Not stated (historical controls) None BRCA1 c.68_69delAG and c.5266dupC 0/146 (0.00%) 109/9371 (1.16%) Not reported
BRCA2 c.5946delT 100% by design 2/146 (1.37%) 119/9514 (1.25%) Not reported
Agalliu[10] USA (predominantly European ancestry) 1993–1996, 2002–2005 Cases vs population frequency estimate Cases: men diagnosed with PCa at age <55 in two case–control studies. No controls; comparison to a previous population BRCA2 frequency estimate for US Caucasians. Median: 49.5 -- None BRCA2 c.3847_3848del and c.4398_4402del 2/2 (100%) 2/257 (0.78%) Population frequency: 0.1% 7.78 (1.80–9.37)
Agalliu [11] US Ashkenazi 1998–2005 Cases vs controls from the same population Cases and controls: self-selected Ashkenazi volunteers who were recruited through advertisements. The participants provided self-reported case/control status. Mean: 69.4 Mean: 68.3 Covariate adjustment for age BRCA1 c.68_69delAG and c.5266dupC 12/978 (1.23%) 11/1247 (0.88%) 1.39 (0.60–3.22)
BRCA2 c.5946delT 100% by design 18/969 (1.86%) 12/1240 (0.97%) 1.92 (0.91–4.07)
Gallagher [12] US Ashkenazi, MSKCC 1988–2007 Cases vs controls from the same population Cases: unselected Ashkenazi men treated with PCa at a single clinic (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York). Controls: Ashkenazi healthy volunteers from a prospective study in New York. Median: 68 Median: 42 Covariate adjustment for age BRCA1 c.68_69delAG 6/832 (0.72%) 4/454 (0.88%) 0.38 (0.05–2.75)
BRCA2 c.5946delT 100% by design 20/832 (2.40%) 3/454 (0.66%) 3.18 (1.52–6.66)
Fachal [13] Spain 2006–2009 Cases vs controls from the same population Cases: unselected men treated for PCa at one clinic (Santiago de Compostela). Controls: healthy men aged >44 (selection unclear). Median: 68 Median: 60 Covariate adjustment for age BRCA1 c.211 A > G 1/905 (0.11%) 3/936 (0.32%) 0.27 (0.01–2.36)
Kote-Jarai [14] UK, UKGPCS Not stated Cases vs population frequency estimate Cases: men with PCa recruited nationwide due to being diagnosed with PCa at age <65 years (87% of the study sample), or due to having a family history of PCa (13% of the study sample). No controls; comparison to a previous UK population BRCA2 frequency estimate. Not stated (87% <65) -- None BRCA2 Any pathogenic variant 11/19 (58%) 19/1832 (1.04%) Population frequency: 0.16% 8.6 (5.1–12.6)
Leongamornlert [15] UK, UKGPCS Not stated Cases vs population frequency estimate Cases: men with PCa recruited nationwide due to being diagnosed with PCa at age <65 years (90% of the study sample), or due to having a family history of PCa (10% of the study sample). No controls; comparison to a previous UK population BRCA1 frequency estimate. Not stated (90% <65) -- None BRCA1 Any pathogenic variant 4/886 (0.45%) Population frequency: 0.12% 3.75 (1.02–9.60)
Cybulski [17] Poland 1999–2012 Cases vs controls from the same population Cases: unselected men with PCa from 14 centres. Controls: population controls from four sources (a random clinic record sample, a population-based study, PSA-screen negative men, colonoscopy screening participants). Mean: 68.8 Mean: 61.2 None BRCA1 c.181 T > G, c.4035del and c.5266dupC 14/3750 (0.37%) 17/3956 (0.43%) 0.9 (0.4–1.8)
Akbari [18] Canada (predominantly European ancestry) 1998–2010 Cases vs controls from the same population Cases and controls: unselected men who had a biopsy because of elevated PSA or abnormal DRE at two clinics; cases were those biopsy-positive, controls were those biopsy-negative. Mean: 65 Not stated None, but cases and controls were likely of comparable ages BRCA2 Any pathogenic variant Not specified 26/1904 (1.37%) 9/2283 (0.39%) 3.5 (1.63–7.48)
Pritchard [19] UK and USA (predominantly European ancestry) Not stated Cases vs population frequency estimate Cases: men with metastatic PCa from seven case series. No controls; comparison to carrier frequency in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database. Not stated Not stated (external estimate) None BRCA1 Any pathogenic variant 6/692 (0.87%) 104/53105 (0.20%) 3.9 (1.4–8.5)
BRCA2 Any pathogenic variant 24/37 (65%) 37/692 (5.35%) 153/53105 (0.29%) 18.6 (13.2–25.3)
Matejcic [21] US African Americans (AA) 1993–2015 Cases vs controls from the same population Cases: men with PCa “overselected for high stage and Gleason score” from incident cases from a US prospective cohort study and two US case series of African American participants. Controls: unaffected African American participants in the US prospective cohort study. Mean: 66.71 Mean: 71.52 Covariate adjustment for age and genetic ancestry BRCA1 Any pathogenic variant 3/1447 (0.21%) 1/995 (0.10%) 2.84 (0.26–30.59)
BRCA2 Any pathogenic variant Not stated 9/1447 (0.62%) 3/995 (0.30%) 1.91 (0.48–7.59)
Uganda 2010–2016 Cases vs controls from the same population Cases: men with prostate cancer from 13 clinics in Uganda. Controls: patients recruited from non-urologic clinics in Uganda. Mean: 70.77 Mean: 65.04 Covariate adjustment for age and genetic ancestry BRCA1 Any pathogenic variant 2/651 (0.31%) 1/486 (0.21%) 1.11 (0.09–13.54)
BRCA2 Any pathogenic variant Not stated 12/651 (1.84%) 1/486 (0.21%) 10.30 (1.28–82.58)
Momozawa [22] Japan, BioBank Japan 2003–2018 Cases vs controls from the same population Cases: unselected men with PCa from a nationwide hospital-based biobank. Controls: male non-cancer patients from the same biobank older than 60 and with no personal or family history of cancer in first- or second-degree relatives. Mean: 71.0 Mean: 70.4 None, but cases and controls were of comparable ages BRCA1 Any pathogenic variant 14/7636 (0.18%) 10/12366 (0.08%) 2.27 (0.94–5.71)
BRCA2 Any pathogenic variant Not specified 83/7636 (1.09%) 24/12366 (0.19%) 5.65 (3.55–9.32)
Oak [24] USA (predominantly European ancestry), The Cancer Genome Atlas 2005–2013 Cases vs controls from the same population Cases: men with PCa from a nationwide biobank. Controls: patients with non-prostate cancers from the same biobank. Not stated Not stated Covariate adjustment for age and genetic ancestry BRCA1 Any pathogenic variant 3/409 (0.73%) Not stated (total: 7711 non-PCa patients) 2.20 (0.62–7.83)
Wokolorczyk [25] Poland 2000–2017 Cases vs controls from the same population Cases: men with PCa who had a family history of PCa in first- or second-degree relatives (three or more relatives with PCa, or two affected relatives of whom at least one was diagnosed before age 60). Controls: participants in an unrelated population-based study. Mean: 61.6 Mean: 59.4 None, but cases and controls were of comparable ages BRCA1 Any pathogenic variant 5/390 (1.28%) 1/308 (0.32%) 4.0 (0.5–34.3)
BRCA2 Any pathogenic variant 0/4 (0%) 4/390 (1.03%) 0/308 (0.00%) --
Nguyen-Dumont [26] Australia Not stated Cases vs controls from the same population Cases: men with aggressive prostate cancer (T4, M1, N1 or Gleason score≥8) from four cohort studies and case series. Controls: male participants in an unrelated trial.c Median: 65–69 Not stated (all ≥70) Covariate adjustment for age BRCA1 Any pathogenic variant 5/833 (0.60%) 10/5356 (0.19%) 2.9 (0.66–12.5)
BRCA2 Any pathogenic variant 6/21 (29%) 19/833 (2.28%) 17/5356 (0.32%) 3.9 (1.1–13)

PCa prostate cancer, PV pathogenic variant, OCCR ovarian cancer cluster region, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.

aWhen available, the table includes adjusted odds ratio estimates (as indicated in the “age-adjustment” field). Otherwise, the reported unadjusted odds ratio estimates by each study are included. For studies that did not report odds ratios, unadjusted odds ratio estimates calculated from the frequencies of case and control PV carriers were used in the meta-analysis (not shown in this descriptive table but included in the forest plots).

bReported on both BRCA1 and BRCA2, but is not included in the BRCA1 meta-analysis due to observing no BRCA1 PVs in the cases which hence did not enable estimation of a 95% CI for the RR.

cThe main analysis in this study compared cases with aggressive prostate cancer to a combined comparison group comprising cases with non-aggressive prostate cancer and unaffected men. The meta-analysis includes the supplementary analysis of cases with aggressive prostate cancer versus unaffected men.