Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aggress Behav. 2021 Oct 5;48(3):279–289. doi: 10.1002/ab.21996

Table 3.

Power estimates for three-way interaction effects between two dichotomous predictors and a continuous predictor of various interrelations

Two-tailed p < .05
N r = .01, d = .02 r = .05, d = .10 r = .10, d = .20
r ab 0 .10 .30 .50 0 .10 .30 .50 0 .10 .30 .50
50 3% 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 4% 9% 8% 7 7
100 3% 3% 3% 3% 6% 6% 6% 6% 13% 13% 14% 12%
150 3% 3% 3% 3% 8% 7% 8% 7% 21% 19% 19% 17%
200 3% 3% 3% 3% 9% 9% 9% 9% 27% 28% 22% 18%
250 3% 4% 4% 3% 12% 11% 11% 11% 34% 32% 28% 26%
300 4% 3% 4% 3% 11% 14% 12% 8% 39% 39% 31% 29%
350 3% 4% 4% 4% 14% 12% 16% 13% 44% 41% 42% 34%
400 4% 4% 4% 3% 16% 14% 14% 14% 52% 49% 50% 36%
450 4% 3% 4% 4% 17% 17% 15% 14% 55% 55% 52% 43%
500 4% 4% 4% 4% 21% 19% 17% 15% 57% 58% 56% 48%
750 4% 5% 4% 4% 28% 26% 21% 21% 76% 76% 72% 68%
1,000 5% 5% 5% 4% 35% 35% 27% 25% 86% 85% 86% 77%
2,500 6% 7% 7% 7% 68% 71% 64% 51% 100% 100% 100% 99%
5,000 11% 10% 9% 10% 92% 93% 92% 86% 100% 100% 100% 100%
7,500 16% 14% 11% 11% 99% 98% 99% 97% 100% 100% 100% 100%
10,000 13% 16% 16% 14% 100% 100% 100% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100%
100,000 88% 88% 83% 78% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
One-tailed p < .05
N r = .01, d = .02 r = .05, d = .10 r = .10, d = .20
r ab 0 .10 .30 .50 0 .10 .30 .50 0 .10 .30 .50
50 6% 6% 6% 6% 9% 9% 9% 8% 15% 14% 11% 12%
100 6% 6% 6% 6% 12% 14% 12% 10% 23% 22% 23% 20%
150 6% 6% 6% 6% 14% 14% 14% 12% 29% 30% 29% 26%
200 7% 7% 7% 6% 18% 16% 17% 15% 39% 38% 36% 31%
250 7% 7% 7% 7% 18% 20% 17% 17% 46% 45% 39% 38%
300 7% 7% 6% 6% 20% 20% 18% 15% 48% 50% 47% 42%
350 7% 7% 7% 7% 22% 20% 22% 19% 56% 54% 53% 48%
400 7% 7% 8% 7% 25% 23% 22% 21% 63% 59% 59% 52%
450 7% 7% 7% 7% 25% 26% 22% 23% 67% 67% 63% 56%
500 7% 8% 7% 8% 30% 29% 29% 22% 70% 70% 67% 63%
750 9% 8% 9% 8% 36% 36% 34% 29% 86% 84% 80% 77%
1,000 9% 9% 9% 8% 46% 48% 40% 34% 93% 91% 91% 85%
2,500 12% 12% 11% 11% 76% 78% 74% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100%
5,000 17% 18% 17% 16% 97% 97% 96% 92% 100% 100% 100% 100%
7,500 24% 22% 19% 17% 100% 99% 99% 98% 100% 100% 100% 100%
10,000 24% 23% 22% 22% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
100,000 93% 94% 90% 86% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Note: r and d values represent the effect size of the interaction term; rab represents the correlation between the continuous predictor and one of the dichotomous variables; we only provide estimates for a series of rab values given that rac and rbc would be = 0 since three-way interactions will likely include experimental conditions which are likely unrelated to the continuous predictor or gender; for the continuous predictors and the dependent variable, we assumed α = .85.