Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 22;10:857561. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.857561

Table 1.

Survey—second part: evaluation of satisfaction.

Question Score: 0–6 Score: 7–10
N (%) N (%)
Cluster A—Adequacy of Medical care I was able to explain my medical problems well enough via televisit 26 (10.1) 231 (89.9)
The absence of physical contact during the televisit was not a relevant problem 66 (25.9) 189 (74.1)
Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of the service provided via televisit 9 (7.6) 109 (92.4)
Cluster B—Psychological impact of telemedicine I was easily able to talk with the medical team during the televisit 23 (8.9) 234 (91.9)
I felt at ease when communicating with my medical team 26 (10.2) 228 (89.8)
I received adequate attention 13 (5.1) 242 (94.9)
I perceived telemedicine as an attention toward me in this period 36 (14.2) 217 (85.8)
Cluster C—Possible advantages and future use of telemedicine I think that televisits are an adequate modality of assistance for my disease 82 (31.9) 175 (68.1)
I am willing to continue some of my follow-up visits via videocall, keeping appointments in person at longer intervals 51 (19.9) 205 (80.1)
Televisits allow me to save time/money and/or time off work (only for parents) 26 (23) 87 (77)
Yes No
Cluster D—Telenursing Did you place/change an insulin pump after February 2020? 112 (41.95) 155 (58.05)
(If yes q.11) Did you change your first infusion set via televisit? 36 (32.1) 76 (67.9)
Score: 0–6 Score: 7–10
N (%) N (%)
(If yes q.12) The nurse's support is effective during telenursing 0 (0) 36 (100)
(If yes q.12) I wouldn't need more telenursing appointments 8 (22.2) 28 (77.8)