Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 29;37(13):e99. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e99

Table 4. Comparisons between ECPHPT and NCPHPT.

Variables ECPHPT (n = 95) NCPHPT (n = 27) P value
Age, yr 54.2 ± 12.1 54.6 ± 16.3 0.893
Sex, n 0.881
Male 13 (13.7%) 4 (14.8%)
Female 82 (86.3%) 23 (85.2%)
BMD (n = 80, 19) 0.074
Normal 21 (26.3%) 6 (31.6%)
Osteopenia 28 (35.0%) 2 (10.5%)
Osteoporosis 31 (38.8%) 11 (57.9%)
Nephrolithiasis, n 13 (13.7%) 2 (7.4%) 0.381
Bone fracture, n 7 (7.4%) 2 (7.4%) 0.995
Preop PTH, pg/mL 120.6 ± 49.2 99.1 ± 24.5 0.002a
Preop corrected sCa, mg/dL 10.1 ± 0.3 9.5 ± 0.6 0.000a
Preop iCa, mg/dL 5.5 ± 0.2 4.9 ± 0.3 0.000a
Preop phosphate, mg/dL 2.8 ± 0.5 3.2 ± 0.5 0.000a
Miami criterion met, n 86 (90.5%) 21 (77.8%) 0.097
No. of lesion 0.481
Single 86 (90.5%) 23 (85.2%)
Double 9 (9.5%) 4 (14.8%)
Parathyroid size, cm
Single 1.5 ± 0.9 1.1 ± 0.5 0.003a
Double 0.6 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.4 0.012a

All continuous variables expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

ECPHPT = normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism with elevated ionized calcium, NCPHPT = normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism with normal ionized calcium, BMD = bone mineral density, PTH = parathyroid hormone.

aStatistical significance.