Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 5;42(9):2847–2854. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02275-9

Table 2.

Dynamic pupillary light responses in healthy control participants and post-COVID-19 subjects with and without long-COVID

Healthy controls (n = 30) With long-COVID (n = 25) Without long-COVID (n = 10) P values
With long-COVID versus control Without long-COVID versus control With versus without long-COVID
Initial pupil diameter (mm) 5.66 ± 0.84 5.62 ± 0.91 5.64 ± 0.82 0.985a 0.997a 0.998a
Amplitude of contraction (mm) 1.83 ± 0.29 1.75 ± 0.35 1.72 ± 0.34 0.625a 0.616a 0.967a
Latency of contraction (ms) 258.0 (234.8–276.5) 282.0 (272.0–296.5) 307.5 (246.3–317.8) 0.012b 0.010b  > 0.999b
Duration of contraction (ms) 662.3 ± 89.2 585.9 ± 83.1 684.9 ± 82.5 0.005a 0.753a 0.009a
Velocity of contraction (mm/s) 5.67 ± 0.94 5.66 ± 1.00 5.03 ± 0.79 0.999a 0.162a 0.185a
Latency of dilation (ms) 911.4 ± 80.0 866.4 ± 77.9 957.8 ± 109.5 0.126 a 0.294a 0.014a
Duration of dilation (ms) 1575.6 ± 86.3 1593.9 ± 101.6 1530.8 ± 105.9 0.759a 0.409a 0.189a
Velocity of dilation (mm/s) 1.69 (1.52–1.84) 1.62 (1.46–1.76) 1.37 (1.24–1.66) 0.085b*

Data are expressed as mean ± SD for parametric variables and median (IQR) for non-parametric variables. The bold P values represent statistically significant differences

*Pairwise comparisons were not performed as the overall test did not show a significant difference among groups

aOne-Way ANOVA test followed by post-hoc Tukey test, bKruskal–Wallis test followed by post-hoc Dunn’s test with adjusted P values using Benjamini–Hochberg procedure

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure