Table 2:
| Model 1c | Model 2d | Model 3e | Model 4f | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (95% CI) | Beta (95% CI) | Beta (95% CI) | Beta (95% CI) | |
| PM2.5 | 0.32*** (0.16, 0.48) | NI | NI | 0.37*** (0.17, 0.56) |
| O3 | NI | −0.02 (−0.15, 0.12) | NI | −0.16┼ (−0.34, 0.02) |
| Pollen | NI | NI | 0.35* (0.05, 0.65) | 0.44* (0.06, 0.83) |
| Season (Ref: Fall) | ||||
| Spring | 0.23 (−0.61, 1.07) | 0.15 (−0.62, 0.93) | −0.19 (−0.93, 0.54) | −0.03 (−0.96, 0.90) |
| Child’s age | −0.06 (−0.24, 0.12) | −0.01 (−0.17, 0.16) | −0.01 (−0.16, 0.14) | −0.05 (−0.24, 0.13) |
| Child’s sex (Ref: Girl) | ||||
| Boy | 0.47 (−0.32, 1.26) | 0.43 (−0.33, 1.19) | 0.49 (−0.19, 1.17) | 0.30 (−0.53, 1.13) |
| Child’s race/ethnicity (Ref: White) | ||||
| Black | 0.78 (−0.23, 1.79) | 0.47 (−0.49, 1.42) | 0.56 (−0.30, 1.43) | 0.89┼ (−0.16, 1.94) |
| Hispanic | 0.82┼ (−0.15, 1.78) | 0.30 (−0.63, 1.22) | 0.48 (−0.36, 1.31) | 0.82 (−0.18, 1.83) |
| Other | −0.06 (−1.56, 1.44) | −0.16 (−1.65, 1.33) | −0.19 (−1.55, 1.18) | −0.06 (−1.60, 1.48) |
| Parent’s age | −0.03 (−0.08, 0.03) | −0.03 (−0.08, 0.02) | −0.03 (−0.07, 0.02) | −0.03 (−0.08, 0.02) |
| Marital status (Ref: Married) | ||||
| Not married | 0.96* (0.15, 1.76) | 0.80* (0.03, 1.57) | 0.78* (0.08, 1.48) | 1.01* (0.17, 1.84) |
| Education (Ref: College or above) | ||||
| High school or below | 0.94* (0.07, 1.81) | 1.04* (0.20, 1.89) | 0.84* (0.11, 1.57) | 1.05* (0.13, 1.97) |
| No. of chronic conditions | 0.80** (0.32, 1.29) | 0.70** (0.22, 1.19) | 0.65** (0.23, 1.07) | 0.90** (0.38, 1.43) |
NI = Variables were not included in the modeling
The results were based on the parameters of ≥3 monitoring days/week and a distance ≤30km for measuring air pollutants (see Table 3 for results of sensitivity analyses);
Higher scores indicate worse asthma control status;
Model 1 only includes PM2.5;
Model 2 only includes O3;
Model 3 only includes pollen;
Model 4 includes PM2.5, O3, and pollen.
p<0.1;
p<0.05;
p<0.01;
p<0.001.