Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;12(9):5374–5385. doi: 10.1039/d1ra08572g

Comparison of catalytic performances toward WGSR over various gold-based catalysts.

Catalysts Au (wt%) Temp. (°C) Gas feed composition Reaction rate (molCO molAu−1 s−1) Ref.
Au/TiO2 1 300 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 0.077 This work
Au/Pr1Ti4Ox 1 300 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 0.092 This work
Au/Pr1Ti2Ox 1 300 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 0.327 This work
Au/Pr2Ti1Ox 1 300 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 0.022 This work
Au/Pr(OH)x–M 1 350 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 0.502 12
Au/PrOx 1 350 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 0.024 12
Au/CeO2 4.7 250 11% CO–26% H2O–26% H2–7% CO2–He 0.127 24
Au@TiO2−x/ZnO 2 250 6% CO–25% H2O–Ar 0.150 25
Au/TiO2 2 227 1% CO–3% H2O–He 0.030 45
Au/CeO2 3 163 4.5% CO–13.5% H2O–He 0.033 61
Au/TiO2 2.3 120 6.8% CO–11% H2O–37.5% H2–8.6% CO2 0.011 62
Au/α-Mo2C 2 150 11% CO–26% H2O–26% H2–7% CO2–N2 1.050 63
Au/Mo2C 1.5 120 7% CO–22% H2O–8.5% CO2–37% H2–Ar 0.020 64
Au/TiO2−x 1.95 200 6% CO–25% H2O–Ar 0.040 65
Au/ZrO2–H2 3.8 210 6.25% CO–50% H2O–N2 0.405 66
Au/CeFeAl 2.17 250 4.5% CO–30% H2O–N2 0.026 67