Comparison of catalytic performances toward WGSR over various gold-based catalysts.
| Catalysts | Au (wt%) | Temp. (°C) | Gas feed composition | Reaction rate (molCO molAu−1 s−1) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Au/TiO2 | 1 | 300 | 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 | 0.077 | This work |
| Au/Pr1Ti4Ox | 1 | 300 | 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 | 0.092 | This work |
| Au/Pr1Ti2Ox | 1 | 300 | 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 | 0.327 | This work |
| Au/Pr2Ti1Ox | 1 | 300 | 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 | 0.022 | This work |
| Au/Pr(OH)x–M | 1 | 350 | 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 | 0.502 | 12 |
| Au/PrOx | 1 | 350 | 2% CO–10% H2O–N2 | 0.024 | 12 |
| Au/CeO2 | 4.7 | 250 | 11% CO–26% H2O–26% H2–7% CO2–He | 0.127 | 24 |
| Au@TiO2−x/ZnO | 2 | 250 | 6% CO–25% H2O–Ar | 0.150 | 25 |
| Au/TiO2 | 2 | 227 | 1% CO–3% H2O–He | 0.030 | 45 |
| Au/CeO2 | 3 | 163 | 4.5% CO–13.5% H2O–He | 0.033 | 61 |
| Au/TiO2 | 2.3 | 120 | 6.8% CO–11% H2O–37.5% H2–8.6% CO2 | 0.011 | 62 |
| Au/α-Mo2C | 2 | 150 | 11% CO–26% H2O–26% H2–7% CO2–N2 | 1.050 | 63 |
| Au/Mo2C | 1.5 | 120 | 7% CO–22% H2O–8.5% CO2–37% H2–Ar | 0.020 | 64 |
| Au/TiO2−x | 1.95 | 200 | 6% CO–25% H2O–Ar | 0.040 | 65 |
| Au/ZrO2–H2 | 3.8 | 210 | 6.25% CO–50% H2O–N2 | 0.405 | 66 |
| Au/CeFeAl | 2.17 | 250 | 4.5% CO–30% H2O–N2 | 0.026 | 67 |