Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 11;12(9):5281–5289. doi: 10.1039/d1ra08034b

Comparison of the NLO parameters of various reported TMDs and this work.

Material λ (nm) n 2 (cm2 W−1) β (cm W−1) NLO response Ref.
MoS2, WS2, NbSe2 532 3 × 10−13 to 1.2 × 10−9 SA-RSA 26
MoTe2/MoS2 800 555.45 × 10−9 SA 31
NbS2, ZrTe2 532 (0.42–0.57) × 10−7 SA-RSA 32
MoS2 532 (3.11–5.16) × 10−4 31.18–145.72 SA-TPA 33
WS2, WSe2, MoS2, Mo0.5W0.5S2 1064 (1.9–19.1) × 10−9 SA-TPA 34
WS2, WSe2 1040 3.36 × 10−12 to 1.28 × 10−10 (1.81–5.29) × 10−6 TPA 35
MoS2 532, 1064 (−48.92 to 1151.01) × 10−9 SA-RSA 36
MoS2/PMMA 800 (16.8–970.4) × 10−9 RSA 37
WS2-PMMA 532 (−16.47 to 4.38) × 10−9 SA-RSA 38
MoS2/TiO2 700 (0.116–3.6) × 10−9 SA-TPA 28
MoS2, WS2 1030 (0.66–2.28) × 10−6 TPA 39
WS2 800 (−92 to 0.01) × 10−9 SA-RSA 40
VS2–NiS2 hybrid 532 (24.23–35.62) × 10−9 (0.141–2.025) × 10−3 TPA This work