Table 1.
Characteristics of the studies included
References | Years | Location | Study design | Sample size | Mean age | Female | Follow-up times (months) | Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KA | MA | KA | MA | KA | MA | ||||||
Kaneda [35] | 2021 | Japan | RCT | 8 | 2 | 76.3 | 75 | NA | 5 | 12 | HKA, mLDFA, mMPTA,FFA,TS |
Matsumoto [29] | 2020 | Japan | RCT | 30 | 30 | 74.2 | 75.5 | 25 | 26 | 12 | HKA, mLDFA, mMPTA, KSS, ROM |
Young [25] | 2020 | New Zealand | RCT | 47 | 48 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 60 | KSS, WOMAC, OKS, EQ-5D, FJ, Complication |
MacDessi [31] | 2020 | Australia | RCT | 70 | 68 | 67.4 | 69.0 | 40 | 34 | 12 | HKA, mLDFA, mMPTA, KOOS, EQ-5D, FJS, OT |
McEwen [28] | 2020 | New Zealand | RCT | 41 | 41 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 24 | HKA, mLDFA, mMPTA, JLOA, FFA,TS, ROM, KOOS, OKS, FJS, Complication |
Laende [32] | 2019 | Canada | RCT | 24 | 23 | 64 | 63 | 16 | 17 | 24 | HKA, mMPTA, OKS |
Yeo [26] | 2018 | South Korea | RCT | 30 | 30 | 72 | 74 | 25 | 27 | 96 | HKA, mLDFA, mMPTA, FFA, TS,WOMAC, ROM |
Matsumoto [30] | 2017 | Japan | RCT | 30 | 30 | 75.3 | 76.1 | 18 | 20 | 24 | HKA, JLOA, KSS, ROM |
Waterson [27] | 2016 | United Kingdom | RCT | 36 | 35 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 12 | KSS, ROM, EQ-5D |
Calliess [33] | 2016 | Germany | RCT | 100 | 100 | 67 | 70 | 61 | 57 | 12 | HKA, mLDFA, mMPTA, FFA, TS, WOMAC, Complication |
Young [24] | 2016 | New Zealand | RCT | 49 | 50 | 72 | 70 | 24 | 24 | 24 | HKA, FKA, mLDFA, mMPTA, TS, KSS, WOMAC, ROM, OKS, EQ-5D, FJS, OT, WL, HS, Complication |
Belvedere [34] | 2015 | Italy | RCT | 6 | 11 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 6 | KSS |
Dossett [20] | 2014 | United States | RCT | 44 | 44 | 66 | 66 | 3 | 6 | 24 | HKA, FKA, mLDFA, mMPTA, JLOA, KSS, WOMAC, ROM, OKS, HS,CHb,WD, Complication |
Dossett [19] | 2012 | United States | RCT | 41 | 41 | 65 | 66 | 2 | 6 | 6 | HKA, FKA, mLDFA, mMPTA, JLOA, FFA, TS, KSS, WOMAC, ROM, OKS, Complication, OT, WL, HS, CHb, WD |
KA kinematic alignment, MA mechanical alignment, HKA hip–knee–ankle angle, FKA femoral knee angle, mLDFA mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, mMPTA mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, JLOA joint line orientation angle, FFA femoral flexion–extension angle, TS tibial slope, KSS knee society score, KOOS Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, OKS Oxford Knee Score, EQ-5D EuroQoL 5-dimension questionnaire, FJS Forgotten Joint Score, ROM range of motion, OT operative time, WL wound length, HS hospital stay, CHb change in hemoglobin, WD walking distance, NA not applicable, RCT randomized controlled clinical trials