Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 4;17:201. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03097-2

Table 5.

The sensitivity analysis results of mLDFA

Study excluded Remaining samples (KA/MA) Overall effect Heterogeneity
MD 95% CI p value I2 (%) p value
Calliess [33] 313/309 − 0.93 − 2.23 to 0.36 0.16 95  < 0.00001
Dossett [19] 372/368 − 0.73 − 2.12 to 0.67 0.31 96  < 0.00001
Dossett [20] 369/365 − 0.77 − 2.18 to 0.65 0.29 96  < 0.00001
Kaneda [35] 405/404 − 0.86 − 2.24 to 0.53 0.23 96  < 0.00001
MacDessi [31] 343/341 − 0.87 − 2.43 to 0.68 0.27 96  < 0.00001
Matsumoto [29] 383/379 − 1.30 − 2.43 to − 0.01 0.05 94  < 0.00001
McEwen [28] 372/368 − 1.35 − 2.44 to − 0.26 0.02 91  < 0.00001
Yeo [26] 383/379 − 0.75 − 2.16 to − 0.67 0.30 95  < 0.00001
Young [24] 364/359 − 0.85 − 2.16 to 0.61 0.25 96  < 0.00001

MD mean difference