Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 4;48:56. doi: 10.1186/s13052-022-01245-2

Table 4.

General characteristics and prevalence of bullying observed in the studies selected during the SLR

Country Year Authors Title Detection mode Sample and age class Bullying Prevalence
Denmark, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden 2019 Amarsson et al. [21] Cyberbullying and traditional bullying among Nordic adolescents and their impact on life satisfaction HBSC 2013/2014 (single item: “How often have you been bullied at school in the past couple of months?”) 32,210 students (11, 13 and 15 y.o.)

Norwegian Males: 2.7–7.8%

Females: 3.1–5.2% Danish M: 2.7–8.0%

F: 2.7–7.3%

Finnish M: 6.4–12.6%

F: 6.5–8.2% Greenlander

M: 13.0–26.4%

F: 13.7–18.6%

Icelandic M: 1.4–6.9%

F: 0.3–5.3%

Swedish M: 2.1–3.5%

F: 2.1–5.7%

Iceland 2018 Garmy et al. [22] Bullying in School-aged Children in Iceland: A Cross-sectional Study HBSC 2013/2014 in Iceland 11,018 students (11, 13 and 15 years old) 5.6%
Australia 2017 Thomas et al. [23] Prevalence and correlates of bullying victimization and perpetration in a nationally representative sample of Australian youth Single item: “In the past 12 months, how often were you bullied or cyberbullied by another person or group of young people?” 2,967 (11–14 y.o.) 15.5%
China 2017 Han et al. [24] School Bullying in Urban China: Prevalence and Correlation with School Climate Ten items on physical, verbal bullying and observers phenomena 1,020 middle school students

Victims: 26.10%

Observers: 28.90% (aggregated data)

United Kingdom 2017 Muijs et al. [25] Can schools reduce bullying? The relationship between school characteristics and the prevalence of bullying behaviors For students: The Olweus Bully‐Victim Questionnaire (OBVQ). For teachers: 65 items-questionnaire based on Kyriakides (2014) scales Survey conducted in 35 primary schools (1,411 last year's students and their 68 teachers)

Victims: 21%

Actors: 11%

United Kingdom 2017 Bevilacqua et al. [26] The role of family and school-level factors in bullying and cyberbullying: a cross sectional study Gatehouse Bullying Scale (12 items) 6,667 students from 40 middle schools

Male: 9.99%

Female: 13.61%

USA (Maryland) 2017 Waarsdorp et al. [27] Ten-Year Trends in Bullying and Related Attitudes Among 4th- to 12th-Graders 10 years survey; anonymous and 13 items questionnaire 246,306 students in 109 schools of Maryland

28.5% in 2005

13.4% in 2014

Vietnam 2017 Le et al. [28] Temporal patterns and predictors of bullying roles among adolescents in Vietnam: a school-based cohort study Two anonymous questionnaires; single item: “How often have you been bullied in any way during the last six months?” 1,424 middle and high school students

48.3%: not involved at all; 22.7% victims only; 6.9% bullies only;

22% bully-victims After six months:

62.1% not involved; 17.6% victims only; 4.7% bullies only; 15.5% bully-victims

Spain 2016 Sanchez-Quelia et al. [29] Trend analysis of bullying victimization prevalence in Spanish adolescent youth at school Based on HBSC 2014 in Spain 15,728 (11–12 y.o.)

5.5% (reported)

23.6% (observed)

U.S.A 2015 Huang et al. [30] The impact of definition and question order on the prevalence of bullying victimization using student self-reports Anonymous, online, 100 items-survey 17,301 students attending 119 high schools Bullying (overall): 9.84% Vs 13.53% cases Vs controls
Italy 2014 National survey [31] Health Behaviour in School-aged Children A single item within a broader nationwide questionnaire, mainly focused on habits and lifestyles 4,072 (11–15 y.o.) 14%
Macedonia 2007 WHO-Unicef-CDC [32] Global school-based student health survey (GSHS) Single item: “During the past 30 days, on how many days were you bullied?” 2,114 students (13–15 y.o.) in 30 schools 10.1%
Tajikistan 2006 WHO-Unicef-CDC [33] Global school-based student health survey (GSHS) Single item: “During the past 30 days, on how many days were you bullied?” 9,714 students (13–15 y.o.) in 99 schools 7.4%