Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 4;23:262. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08463-2

Table 5.

Summary of Ingenuity Pathway Analysis results for C2 and SR comparison

Network Score Functions
42 Carbohydrate Metabolism, Energy Production
Regulators in Network Score Targets Functions
MACROH2A1 3 4 Consumption of D-glucose, Binding of lipid, Binding of palmitoyl-coenzyme A
Upstream Regulator Fold Molecule Type Activation z-score P Value
NFKBIA −1.596 transcription regulator −2.377 0.000129
MYC −1.511 transcription regulator 2.359 1.79E-09
XBP1 1.878 transcription regulator 2.593 1.86E-05

The top three networks (network score > 40) and top three regulator effect networks (consistency score > 0, target number > 3, |z-score| > 2, p-value < 0.05) are shown. The top five activated (z-score > 2) and inhibited (z-score < − 2) upstream regulators and master regulators in causal networks are shown (|fold change| > 1.5, |z-score| > 2, p-value < 0.05). Only upstream regulators and master regulators exhibiting differential expression between C2 and SR groups are displayed