Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 7;42(2):96-106. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2022.96

Table 2.

Genotype and allele frequencies for vitiligo cases and controls (including crude odds ratios for vitiligo risk).

Vitiligo (n=152) Controls (n=159) Odds ratio 95% CI P value
ApaI (rs79785232)
AA 73 (48) 85 (53.4)
AC 79 (52) 65 (40.9) 0.71 0.45–1.11 .1333
CC 0* 9 (5.7) 23.1 1.31–403.6 .031
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
Chi-square 18.738 0.567
P value 0.001 0.451
AC+CC vs AA 152 (100) 150 (94.3) 19.25 1.11–333.7 .04
AC vs AA+CC 79 (52) 65 (40.9) 1.2 0.805–1.786 .37
CC vs AA+AC 0* 9 (5.7) 0.05 0.002–0.759 .0317
A 225 (0.74) 235 (0.739)
C 79 (0.26) 83 (0.261) 0.994 0.694–1.422 .974
BsmI (rs1544410)
AA 27 (17.8) 35 (22.1)
AG 81 (53.3) 95 (59.7) 1.10 0.61–1.98 .73
GG 44 (28.9) 29 (18.2) 1.78 1.02–3.099 .04
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
Chi-square 0.955 6.15
P value .328 .013
AG+GG vs AA 125 (82.2) 124 (77.9) 1.18 0.803–1.74 .39
AG vs AA+GG 81 (53.3) 95 (59.7) 0.562 0.322–0.978 .04
GG vs AA+AG 44 (28.9) 29 (18.2) 1.5 0.885–2.55 .13
A 135 (0.44) 165 (0.52)
G 169 (0.56) 153 (0.48) 1.35 0.984–1.85 .06
TaqI (rs731236)
TT 91 (59.9) 60 (37.7)
TC 61 (40.1) 93 (58.5) 0.43 0.27–0.68 .0003
CC 0* 6 (3.8) 0.05 0.002–0.919 .04
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
Chi-square 9.578 16.519
P value .0019 0.001
TC+CC vs TT 61* (40.1) 99 (62.3) 0.40 0.25–0.63 .0001
TC vs TT+CC 61 (40.1) 93 (58.5) 0.47 0.29–0.73 .001
CC vs TT+TC 0* 6 (3.8) 0.07 0.004–1.37 .02
T 243 (0.80) 213 (0.67)
C 61 (0.20) 105 (0.33) 0.50 0.35–0.73 .0003
Fok1 (rs2228570)
CC 110 (72.4) 114 (71.7)
CT 42 (27.6) 45 (28.3) 0.97 0.58–1.58 .89
TT 0* 0* 1.07 0.02–55.17 .97
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
Chi-square 3.90 4.32
P value .04 .037
CT+TT vs CC 42 (27.6) 45 (28.3) 0.99 0.60–1.61 .97
CT vs CC+TT 42 (27.6) 45 (28.3) 0.93 0.018–48.13 .97
TT vs CT+CC 0* 0* 1.07 0.02–55.17 .97
C 262(0.86) 273 (0.85)
T 42 (0.14) 45 (0.15) 0.97 0.618–1.53 .90
*

Yates continuity correction.