Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD001896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001896.pub2

Chen 1996.

Methods Allocation Concealment: unclear. 
 Randomisation: unclear, stated as randomised no further details given. 
 Blinding: unclear. 
 Power Calculation: none stated. 
 Duration of trial: Recruited from Jan 1992 to July 1993. Patients followed up for 12 months.
Participants Number of women randomised: 68. 
 Number of women analysed: 68. 
 Drop‐outs/withdrawals: none. 
 Inclusion criteria: women with primary dysmenorrhoea and/or chronic pelvic pain. 
 Exclusion criteria: pelvic pathology (lesions). 
 Diagnosis: at laparoscopy, those without lesions that could be assoc with dysmenorrhoea were randomised. 
 Age: 18 to 40 years. 
 Location: Taiwan.
Interventions Treatment: laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation. 
 Control: laparoscopic presacral neurectomy.
Outcomes Pain relief measured on a 5 point scale (0 = no pain to 4 = incapacitating pain unresponsive to potent pain relievers and the inability to function). Pain was measured at baseline, 3 months, 12 months and data was dichotomised into success 100 > 50% pain relief or failure 50 > 0% pain relief. 
 Adverse effects.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear