Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD001896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001896.pub2

Sutton 2001.

Methods Allocation Concealment: unclear. 
 Randomisation: computer‐generated randomisation sequence. 
 Blinding: double; participant and research nurse. 
 Power Calculation: done; sample for 90% power was 22 women in each group. 
 Duration of trial: women assessed at 3 and 6 months post operative (recruitment occurred over 33 months Feb.1995 to Nov. 1997).
Participants Number of women randomised: 51. 
 Number of women analysed: 46 at 6 months. 
 Drop‐outs/withdrawals: 5 (1 became pregnant and 4 were lost to follow up). However data points for to 14 women were missing for some analyses. 
 Inclusion criteria: women with history and physical or laparoscopic examination suggestive of endometriosis who had not received medical treatment for endometriosis within the last 6 months, and had not previously undergone surgical treatment of their disease. 
 Exclusion criteria: stage IV disease or any other pathology that may have been responsible in whole, or in part for their symptoms. 
 Diagnosis: at laparoscopy those with stage IV disease or other pathology were excluded. 
 Age: mean 28 (20 to 41). 
 Location: Surrey, UK.
Interventions Treatment: LUNA with laparoscopic treatment of all visible endometriosis. 
 Control: laparoscopic treatment of all visible endometriosis .
Outcomes Dysmenorrhoea, measured by linear analogue scale (0 ‐ 10) and pain scoring questionnaire. 
 Adverse effects.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear