Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;22(4):14. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.4.14

Table A1.

Linear mixed model terms for all models used in study 1 and 2.

Term t-value Df Beta estimate Standard error p value
Distortion, familiarity, and orientation as predictors of uncanniness
Distortion 29.083 6326 12.828 0.441 0.001
Familiarity −1.070 6331 −0.927 0.867 0.798
Orientation −5.345 6326 −4.713 0.882 0.297
Distortion × familiarity −5.149 6326 −3.134 0.609 0.001
Distortion × orientation −10.306 6326 −6.429 0.624 0.001
Familiarity × orientation 2.727 6326 3.138 1.217 0.008
All factors 2.292 6326 1.971 0.86 0.010
Distortion, familiarity, and orientation as predictors of “identical” response rates
Distortion −65.087 24900 −0.146 .002 <0.001
Familiarity 10.996 34910 0.045 .004 <0.001
Orientation 16.853 24370 0.086 .005 <0.001
Distortion × familiarity 5.419 24900 0.017 .003 <0.001
Distortion × orientation 10.707 24900 0.044 .003 <0.001
Familiarity × orientation −4.989 24910 0.028 .006 <0.001
All factors −0.140 24900 <.001 .004 0.888
Distortion, familiarity, orientation, and “identical” response rates as predictors of uncanniness
Distortion 34.314 9385 12.897 0.3759 <0.001
Familiarity −6.684 9388 −4.8249 0.7218 <0.001
Orientation −11.077 9120 −10.2149 0.9222 <0.001
Distortion × familiarity −4.819 9380 −2.5319 0.5254 <0.001
Distortion × orientation −11.051 9382 −6.2399 0.5646 <0.001
Familiarity × orientation 7.029 9384 7.5817 1.0787 <0.001
Distortion × familiarity × orientation 3.702 9379 2.8946 0.7819 <0.001
“Identical” response rates only −38.37 9431 −31.47 0.82 <0.001