Table 2.
Configurational Model with Three Solution Pathways for Higher Value of Reach Outcome in N=13 Churches
| Outcome: Reach | # Years health ministry history | Number of members | Number of members | # Health areas in past 2 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | 5–10 | <100 | <100 | 9+ |
| High | 1–4 | 101–499 | 101–499 | 1–4 |
| High | 0 | <100 | <100 | 1–4 |
| High | 0 | 101–499 | 101–499 | 1–4 |
| High | 1–4 | <100 | <100 | 5–8 |
| High | 1–4 | <100 | <100 | 9+ |
| Low | 0 | 101–499 | 101–499 | 9+ |
| Low | 5–10 | 101–499 | 101–499 | 5–8 |
| Low | 5–10 | 500+ | 500+ | 5–8 |
| Low | 11+ | 101–499 | 101–499 | 9+ |
| Low | 5–10 | 101–499 | 101–499 | 9+ |
| Low | 0 | 500+ | 500+ | 1–4 |
Note. Reach = Percent of eligible members participating in the intervention: 10%−29% = Low; 30%−78% = High (based on median split). Shading is used for clarity in reporting the configurational analysis.