Table 3.
Configurational Model with Three Solution Pathways for Lower Value of Reach Outcome in N=13 Churches
| Outcome: Reach | Number of members | Number of members | # Health areas in past 2 years | # Years health ministry history | # Health areas in past 2 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 101–499 | 101–499 | 9+ | 0 | 9+ |
| Low | 101–499 | 101–499 | 5–8 | 5–10 | 5–8 |
| Low | 500+ | 500+ | 5–8 | 5–10 | 5–8 |
| Low | 101–499 | 101–499 | 9+ | 11+ | 9+ |
| Low | 101–499 | 101–499 | 9+ | 5–10 | 9+ |
| Low | 500+ | 500+ | 1–4 | 0 | 1–4 |
| High | <100 | <100 | 9+ | 5–10 | 9+ |
| High | 101–499 | 101–499 | 1–4 | 1–4 | 1–4 |
| High | <100 | <100 | 1–4 | 0 | 1–4 |
| High | 101–499 | 101–499 | 1–4 | 0 | 1–4 |
| High | <100 | <100 | 5–8 | 1–4 | 5–8 |
| High | <100 | <100 | 9+ | 1–4 | 9+ |
Note. Reach = Percent of eligible members participating in the intervention: 10%−29% = Low; 30%−78% = High (based on median split). Shading is used for clarity in reporting the configurational analysis.