Table 4.
Associations Between Stress and Alcohol Craving at the Subsequent EMA Time Point by Racial Identity and ADHD History
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main effect | Stress X Race | Black | White | Stress X ADHD | ADHD | No ADHD | |||||||||||||||
| B | SE | p | B | SE | p | B | SE | p | B | SE | p | B | SE | p | B | SE | p | B | SE | p | |
| Stress (BETWEEN-person) | .12 | .03 | < .001 | .13 | .06 | .021 | .20 | .05 | < .001 | .07 | .04 | .058 | .02 | .06 | .762 | .13 | .03 | < .001 | .11 | .05 | .044 |
| Stress (WITHIN-person) | .01 | .01 | .295 | .05 | .02 | .001 | .04 | .01 | .001 | −.01 | .01 | .304 | −.01 | .01 | .419 | .002 | .01 | .821 | .01 | .01 | .192 |
| Assessment time of day | .08 | .005 | < .001 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Number of days in study | −.02 | .003 | < .001 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Weekend | .11 | .02 | < .001 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (1=Black) | .08 | .08 | .295 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Sex (1=Male) | −.05 | .08 | .566 | ||||||||||||||||||
| ADHD history (1=ADHD) | −.02 | .07 | .755 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Income | −.04 | .02 | .072 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Education | .01 | .03 | .681 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Age | .01 | .01 | .156 | ||||||||||||||||||
Notes. Three-level multilevel models (clustered on study ID and study day; random slope for number of days in study) estimated with maximum likelihood estimation. Interactions probed by rotating the reference group for racial identity/ADHD in Model 1. Racial identity is abbreviated to race in the table. Bolded entries are statistically significant. N = 225 (reduced from full N of 229 because 4 individuals did not have valid data for both stress and craving at the subsequent EMA time point).