Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Nov 30;23(4):528–536.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.11.005

Table 3.

Quality of assessment of RCTs with Cochrane risk of bias tool (n=2) and quasi-experimental studies with Robin-I tool (n=7)

Randomized Controlled Trials (n=2)
Author, year Sequence Generation Allocation Concealment Participant Blinding Assessor blinding Incomplete outcome data Selective reporting Other bias
Boersma, 2019 L H H L H L L
Heltne, 2017 L H H H L L L
Quasi-experimental Studies (n=7)
Author, Year Confounding Selection Classification Deviation from intervention Missing data Measurement of outcomes Selection of outcomes Overall

Al-Jazairi, 2017 Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate
Cortez, 2018 Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate
Cronin, 2011 Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate
Hohn, 2014 Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate
Mason, 2018 Serious Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Serious Moderate Serious
Shafiekhani, 2019 Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate
Zullig, 2019 Serious Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Serious Serious Serious

L= low risk of bias, H= high risk of bias, U = unclear risk of bias