Skip to main content
. 2000 May;44(5):1146–1152. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.5.1146-1152.2000

TABLE 4.

Pulmonary virus titer on day 4 in cotton rats administered placebo or PAMPS at different intervals after experimental inoculation of the animals with MVa

Expt no. and group Challenge virus Treatment Dose (mg/kg) Time of dosing Virus titer (log10/g lung) in cotton rat no.:
Mean ± SD titer
CR1 CR2 CR3 CR4
Expt 1
 1 MV Placebo 0 +5 min 4.0 4.5 4.1 3.5 4.1 ± 0.3
 2 MV PAMPS 100 +5 min 0 0 3.0 0 0.8 ± 1.5b
 3 RSV PAMPS 100 +5 min 0 0 0 0 0 ± 0b
 4 MV Placebo 0 +60 min 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.3 ± 0.5
 5 MV PAMPS 100 +60 min 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.5 4.1 ± 0.3
Expt 2
 1 MV Placebo 0 Days 0–3 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.1 4.0 ± 0.4
 2 MV PAMPS 100 Day 0 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.3 ± 0.3b
 3 MV PAMPS 100 Days 1–3 4.0 4.5 4.6 4.0 4.3 ± 0.3
 4 MV PAMPS 100 Days 0–3 3.1 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.1 ± 0.3b
a

All of the cotton rats used in these experiments were inoculated i.n. on day 0 with 104 median CCID50s of MV or RSV. In experiment 1, the animals in groups 1 to 3 were inoculated i.n. with either placebo (distilled water) or PAMPS 5 min after virus inoculation, while those in groups 4 and 5 were inoculated with PAMPS 55 min later. In experiment 2, the animals were inoculated i.n. with PAMPS on the indicated days, with all of the inoculations on day 0 being given 30 min after virus inoculation. All of the cotton rats were sacrificed on day 4 after virus inoculation, at which times their lungs were removed and tested for virus. 

b

Boldfaced means and standard deviations indicate statistical significance between means of these groups and the placebo control (P ≤ 0.05) as determined by the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance test; number of animals per group was 4.