Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 5;12:5651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09627-6

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Characterization and quantification of isolated EVs. (a) Flow cytometric analysis was performed using magnetic beads coated with CD9 EV marker. These coated beads were incubated with a PE-conjugated CD81 antibody. Analaysis demonstrated as dot plot. FSC represents forward scatter and SSC represents size vs. side scatter. P1 represents gate on the doublet discrimination according to FSC-H vs FSC-A. (b) Size distribution and quantification of isolated extracellular vesicles were analyzed using qNanoGold. A polyurethane nanopore rated for particles < 100 Npm (NP100-, Izon Science, UK) was used. The measured mean diameter of EVS was approximately 100 nm. (c) Western blot was performed to detect EV proteins and cellular contaminants in isolated EVs. Tsg101 was used as EV markers and endoplasmic reticulum marker Calnexin was used as a negative control. (d) EVs isolated from untreated H9c2 (Dil-Control-EV) and ticagrelor treated H9c2 (Dil-Tica-EV) stained with Dil dye. The uptake of DiI-labeled EVs by H9c2 cells was visualized by confocal microscopy. The cells incubated with Dil-labelled PBS are the negative control group. (e) EVs isolated from control and ticagrelor treated H9c2 cells were visualized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).