Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 22;33(3):395–405. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001466

TABLE 5.

Recommendations for Methods When Assessing Continuous Outcomes

Recommended Uses Recommended With Potential Alterations Not Generally Recommended Not Applicable
Cross-classification Estimation at large-sample sizesa Estimation at small sample sizesa Variable selection
Regression (saturated model) Estimation at large-sample sizesa Estimation at small sample sizesa Variable selection (partial information)
MAIHDAb Estimation at all sizes Variable selection (partial information)
CARTc Estimation at all sample sizes
Variable selection
CTreed Estimation at all sample sizes Variable selection (may be improved with cross-validation for alpha)
Random forest Estimation at all sample sizes Variable selection: with adjusted VIMe
a

Defining sample size as “large” or “small” is relative to the number of intersections of interest. In our scenario with 192 intersections of interest, we considered smaller sample sizes to be N = 2,000 to 5,000 and larger sample sizes as N = 50,000 and greater. A smaller number of intersections under study would allow for smaller sample sizes.

b

Multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy.

c

Classification and regression trees.

d

Conditional inference trees.

e

Variable importance measure.