Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 5;8(1):e12288. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12288

TABLE 3.

Cognitive function at two assessments by N‐3 supplement assignment, for VITAL‐Cog participants aged 60+ years, (n = 3424) assessed by telephone and for CTSC‐Cog participants aged 60+ years, (n = 794) assessed in person: Individual cognitive tests*

VITAL‐COG (n = 3424; telephone assessments) CTSC‐COG (n = 794; in‐person assessments)
N‐3 group Placebo group N‐3 group Placebo group
N Mean (SE) N Mean (SE) Difference in score at each timepoint (N3 group – placebo group;95% CI) N Mean (SE) N Mean (SE) Difference in score at each timepoint (N3 group – placebo group; 95% CI)
Cognitive tests common to the two substudies Cognitive tests common to the two substudies
TICS 10 words ‐immediate recall Difference in score

TICS 10 words

immediate recall

Difference in score
First assessment score 14980 4.65 (0.04) 1486 4.66 (0.04) –0.01 (–0.13, 0.11) First assessment score 385 4.69 (0.07) 391 4.78 (0.06) –0.09 (–0.28, 0.09)
Second assessment score 1440 4.66 (0.04) 1483 4.76 (0.04) –0.10 (–0.22, 0.03) Second assessment score 251 4.88 (0.09) 264 4.93 (0.08) –0.05 (–0.28, 0.19)

TICS 10 words ‐

delayed recall

Difference in score

TICS 10 words ‐

delayed recall

Difference in score
First assessment score 14980 2.67 (0.05) 1486 2.73 (0.05) –0.06 (–0.19, 0.08) First assessment score 385 1.92 (0.09) 391 2.01 (0.09) –0.09 (–0.33, 0.15)
Second assessment score 1440 2.66 (0.05) 1483

2.78 (0.05)

–0.12 (–0.26, 0.03) Second assessment score 251 2.13 (0.10) 264 2.31 (0.11) –0.18 (–0.48, 0.11)

EBMT –

immediate recall

Difference in score

EBMT –

immediate recall

Difference in score
First assessment score 14980 9.60 (0.04) 1486 9.57 (0.04) 0.03 (–0.09, 0.15) First assessment score 385 9.71 (0.09) 391 9.77 (0.08) –0.06 (–0.29, 0.17)
Second assessment score 1440 9.48 (0.05) 1483 9.60 (0.05) –0.12 (–0.25, 0.01) Second assessment score 251 9.96 (0.10) 264 10.03 (0.10) –0.07 (–0.34, 0.20)

EBMT –

delayed recall

Difference in score

EBMT –

delayed recall

Difference in score
First assessment score 14980 9.25 (0.05) 1486 9.21 (0.05) 0.04 (–0.09, 0.17) First assessment score 385 9.31 (0.09) 391 9.35 (0.08) –0.04 (–0.28, 0.20)
2nd assessment score 1440 9.13 (0.05) 1483 9.18 (0.05) –0.05 (–0.19, 0.10) Second assessment score 251 9.55 (0.10) 264 9.57 (0.10) –0.01 (–0.30, 0.27)
Animal naming test Difference in score Animal naming test Difference in score
First assessment score 14980 19.34 (0.14) 1486 19.47 (0.14) –0.13 (–0.53, 0.26) First assessment score 385 20.81 (0.29) 391 20.49 (0.31) 0.32 (–0.52, 1.15)
Second assessment score 1440 19.14 (0.16) 1483 19.30 (0.15) –0.16 (–0.59, 0.27) Second assessment score‡ 251 20.09 (0.32) 264 20.84 (0.33) –0.76 (–1.66, 0.14)
Cognitive tests unique to each substudy Cognitive tests unique to each substudy
Digit span backward Difference in score Vegetable naming test Difference in score
First assessment score 14980 6.75 (0.06) 1486 6.81 (0.06) –0.05 (–0.22, 0.12) First assessment score 385 15.31 (0.23) 391 15.60 (0.23) –0.29 (–0.93, 0.35)
Second assessment score 1440 2.07 (0.08) 1483

1.94 (0.07)

0.13 (–0.08, 0.33) Second assessment score 251 15.10 (0.26) 264 15.23 (0.24) –0.13 (–0.84, 0.58)

Oral Trail Making Test –

Part A

Difference in score

Trail Making Test –

Part A

Difference in score
First assessment score 14980 10.41 (0.09) 1486 10.52 (0.10) –0.11 (–0.36, 0.15) First assessment score 385 29.89 (0.53) 391

29.26 (0.53)

0.63 (–0.84, 2.10)
Second assessment score 1440 10.19 (0.14) 1483 10.30 (0.14) –0.11 (–0.50, 0.28) Second assessment score 251 29.67 (0.56) 264

29.35 (0.51)

0.32 (–1.16, 1.81)

Oral Trail Making Test –

Part B

Difference in score

Trail Making Test –

Part B

Difference in score
First assessment score 14980 39.16 (0.63) 1486 38.27 (0.61) 0.88 (–0.84, 2.60) First assessment score 385 82.24 (2.27) 391 80.73 (2.13) 1.51 (–4.60, 7.61)
Second assessment score 1440 38.96 (0.62) 1483 38.94 (0.62) 0.02 (–1.70, 1.75) Second assessment score 251 72.56 (1.76) 264 73.63 (2.08) –1.07 (–6.41, 4.27)

Abbreviations: 3MS, Modified Mini‐Mental State Examination (range = 0–100); 25 CI, confidence interval; CTSC, Clinical and Translational Science Center for VITAL in Boston, MA; SE, standard error; TICS, Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (range = 0–41); 19 VITAL, Vitamin D and Omega‐3 Trial.

*

In the VITAL‐Cog, 2483 completed both assessments, 501 completed only the baseline, 440 completed only the second assessment. In the CTSC‐Cog, 497 completed both assessments, 279 completed only the baseline, and 18 completed only the second assessment.

For a description of the tests, see previous section on VITAL‐Cog telephone cognitive function assessment section.

Least squares means and standard errors and differences of least squares means and standard errors were derived from univariate models.