Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 5;8(1):e12288. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12288

TABLE 5.

Mean difference (95% CI) in rate of change in global score* between the N‐3 and placebo groups: Effect modification by risk factors for cognitive decline

graphic file with name TRC2-8-e12288-g001.jpg

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CTSC‐Cog, subset that received in‐person interviews at the Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center for VITAL in Boston, MA; CVD, cardiovascular disease; VITAL‐Cog, subset that received telephone cognitive interviews in VITAL.

*

For definitions of the global scores for the two populations, see footnote for Table 2.

Mean difference in annual rate of decline of n‐3 – placebo groups from multivariable‐adjusted linear mixed models: see footnotes for Tables 2 and 3. The stratified analyses were done among those with non‐missing data on the effect modifier.

None of the interaction terms were significant at the Bonferroni‐corrected significance threshold of P = .0036 (= 0.05/14 other modifiers): p‐interaction≥0.04

Stratum‐specific estimates and interaction terms were pooled using Dersimonian and Laird fixed‐effects method for meta‐analysis 32 except for where the P for heterogeneity across the two substudies for the interaction term for age was < 0.05 (P = .03) and results were meta‐analyzed with random‐effects.

||

See footnote in Table 1 for definition of depression.

**

Median for the global score was 0.05 in both the VITAL‐Cog and the CTSC‐Cog.

††

Compliance is defined as self‐reported taking of ≥two‐thirds of pills on all the follow‐up questionnaires between the first and the second cognitive assessment and not initiating out‐of‐study fish oil supplementation.