Table 2.
The cognitive errors of each mastery pattern classification.
| Mastery pattern | No. | Cognitive errors |
|---|---|---|
| EIP = 0 | 1 | The interaction of electricity and magnetism was incorrectly considered as electromagnetic induction |
| 2 | Confusion over the physical principles on which generators and motors are based | |
| (CIC1, CIC2) = (0X) | 3 | Misunderstanding that magnetic flux changes if the conductor cuts the magnetic field lines |
| (CIC1, CIC2) = (10) | 4 | Misunderstanding that an induced current can be generated if the conductor cuts the magnetic field lines |
| 5 | Misunderstanding that the unclosed coil has no magnetic flux, and the magnetic flux changes when it is closed again | |
| 6 | Did not understand the magnetic field distribution around the bar magnet | |
| (LL1, LL2, LL3) = (0XX) | 7 | Did not understand the concept of flux change |
| 8 | Could not describe Lenz’s law | |
| (LL1, LL2, LL3) = (10X) | 9 | Could not translate a change in the physical situation into a change in the magnetic flux, thereby not knowing how to use Lenz’s law |
| 10 | Lenz’s law was not understood in terms of energy, and the transformation of functional relations in electromagnetic induction was not understood. | |
| 11 | In the process of using the formula, the formula was mistaken for Lenz’s law | |
| (LL1, LL2, LL3) = (110) | 12 | In physical situations, the hindrances of Lenz’s law were not used to determine the direction of the induced current |
| (RHR1, RHR2) = (0X) | 13 | Students could not distinguish between the right-hand rule, left-hand rule, and ampere rule |
| 14 | Misunderstanding that the direction of the conductor cutting magnetic field lines is the direction of the conductor force | |
| 15 | It was incorrectly believed that the direction of the induced electromotive force is opposite to that of the induced current | |
| (RHR1, RHR2) = (10) | 16 | Incorrectly used the left-hand rule to solve the electromagnetic induction problem |
| 17 | Did not understand the direction of the current or magnetic field lines in the diagram | |
| (FL1, FL2, FL3, FL4) = (0XXX) | 18 | Did not know the basic concept of Faraday’s law |
| 19 | Could write Faraday’s law formula but could not explain Faraday’s law | |
| 20 | Inability to distinguish between the rate of change and quantity of change | |
| (FL1, FL2, FL3, FL4) = (10XX) | 21 | The left-hand rule was used |
| 22 | Did not understand the circuit knowledge. Misjudged the direction of current and potential inside the source | |
| 23 | Did not know that the conductor cutting the magnetic field lines is equivalent to the power supply | |
| (FL1, FL2, FL3, FL4) = (110X) | 24 | Did not know that the conductor cutting the magnetic field lines is equivalent to the power supply |
| 25 | Did not know the terminal voltage | |
| 26 | Did not know that the uniform increase of B and δ B/δ t have the same meaning, and mistook the former for the magnetic flux uniform increase | |
| (FL1, FL2, FL3, FL4) = (1110) | 27 | Could not find the functional relationship between each physical quantity and t |
| 28 | No in-depth understanding of the concept of acceleration | |
| 29 | Did not consider that the width of the field is larger than the edge of the wire | |
| 30 | Calculation error |
EIP, Electromagnetic induction phenomenon: knowledge; CIC1, Conditions to generate induced current: knowledge; CIC2, Conditions to generate induced current: understanding; LL1, Lenz’s Law: knowledge; LL2, Lenz’s Law: understanding; LL3, Lenz’s Law: application; RHR1, Right-hand rule: knowledge; RHR2, Right-hand rule: understanding; FL1, Faraday’s law: knowledge; FL2, Faraday’s law: understanding; FL3, Faraday’s law: application; and FL4, Faraday’s law: integrated application.