Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD006742. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006742.pub2

for the main comparison.

Antihypertensive drug therapy compared with placebo for mild hypertension
Patient or population: Adults with mild hypertension and no cardiovascular disease
Settings: ambulatory
Intervention: Stepped care antihypertensive drug therapy
Comparison: Placebo
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Placebo Antihypertensive drugs
Mortality
4 to 5 years
Low risk population RR 0.85 (0.63 to 1.15) 8912
 (4) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low More RCTs needed as a significant benefit may have been missed.
15 per 1000 13 per 1000 
 (9 to 17)
High risk population
30 per 1000 26 per 1000 
 (18 to 34)
Total CV events
5 years
Low risk population RR 0.97 (0.72 to 1.32) 7080
 (3) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low More RCTs needed as wide confidence intervals are consistent with a significant benefit or a significant harm.
15 per 1000 15 per 1000 
 (11 to 20)
High risk population
30 per 1000 29 per 1000 
 (22 to 40)
Withdrawals due to adverse effects
5 years
Low risk population RR 4.80 (4.14 to 5.57) 17,354
 (1) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate Withdrawals due to adverse effects are increased. It was downgraded to moderate as it was not limited to a primary prevention population with mild hypertension.
15 per 1000 72 per 1000 
 (62 to 84)
High risk population
30 per 1000 144 per 1000 
 (124 to 168)
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk Ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

The median control group risk was derived from the event rate in the control group i.e. 20 per 1000 mortality, 24 per 1000 total CV events and 23 per 1000 withdrawals due to adverse effects.