Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 1;3(4):468–485. doi: 10.1039/d1cb00244a

Results from NanoBRET assays. IC50 values (mean ± SD) and calculated Ki values based on the Cheng–Prusoff equationa of our Sirt2 inhibitors and different published Sirt2 inhibitors. n.i. = no inhibition (% inhibition < 10%@100 μM).

Compound In vitro Sirt2 activity assay NanoBRET assay Compound In vitro Sirt2 activity assay NanoBRET assay
IC50 [μM] IC50 [μM] K i value [μM] IC50 [μM] (ref) IC50 [μM] K i value [μM]
SirReal2 0.44 ± 0.08 43%@10 μM AEM2 3.8 (70) 5.2 ± 0.2 0.58 ± 0.02
2 0.12 ± 0.01 2.7 ± 0.1 0.30 ± 0.01 AK-7 15.5 (71) 20 ± 1.6 2.3 ± 0.2
7 624 ± 71.9 n.i. EX-527 32.6 (72) n.i.
8 0.16 ± 0.02 1.0 ± 0.05 0.11 ± 0.005 JH-T4 0.29 ± 0.01 1.9 ± 0.2 0.28 ± 0.06
9 0.17 ± 0.02 0.40 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.002 Ro 31-8220 0.8 (73) 9.9 ± 0.6 1.1 ± 0.07
10 0.15 ± 0.01 0.41 ± 0.02 0.05 ± 0.002 Sirtinol 38–58 (72) n.i.
11 0.11 ± 0.005 37%@10 μM
12 0.12 ± 0.01 0.098 ± 0.004 0.01 ± 0.005
a

For the calculation we used the tracer concentration in the medium as this is a common procedure in literature.74–76