Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 6;80:111. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00849-8

Table 5.

Multilevel multivariable logistic regression results for the association between women’s decision-making capacity and comprehensive knowledge of HIV/AIDS among married women: Evidence from 23 sub-Saharan African countries Demographic and Health Surveys (2010–2020) (N = 182,696)

Model 0 Model I Model II Model III
Decision making
 No (Ref)
 Yes 1.21 (1.17–1.25)*** 1.20 (1.16–1.25)***
Women’s age in years
 15–19 (Ref)
 20–24 1.21 (1.14–1.30)*** 1.21 (1.13–1.29)***
 25–29 1.36 (1.27–1.46)*** 1.36 (1.27–1.46)***
 30–34 1.51 (1.40–1.63)*** 1.51 (1.40–1.63)***
 35–39 1.60 (1.47–1.75)*** 1.60 (1.47–1.75)***
 40–44 1.62 (1.48–1.76)*** 1.61 (1.48–1.76)***
 45–49 1.63 (1.49–1.79)*** 1.63 (1.49–1.79)***
Women’s educational level
 No formal education (Ref)
 Primary school 1.40 (1.34–1.46)*** 1.40 (1.34–1.46)***
 Secondary school 2.02 (1.92–2.13)*** 2.06 (1.95–2.16)***
 Higher education 2.88 (2.57–3.24)*** 2.93 (2.62–3.29)***
Husband’s educational level
 No formal education (Ref)
 Primary school 1.19 (1.14–1.24)*** 1.18 (1.13–1.23)***
 Secondary school 1.02 (0.98–1.07) 1.04 (0.99–1.09)
 Higher education 1.10 (1.02–1.19)* 1.11 (1.03–1.20)**
Women’s occupation
 Not employed (Ref)
 Professional/technical/managerial 1.34 (1.23–1.47)*** 1.32 (1.21–1.44)***
 Agricultural 1.42 (1.35–1.49)*** 1.37 (1.31–1.44)***
 Manual 1.24 (1.16–1.33)*** 1.22 (1.14–1.31)***
 Other 0.97 (0.93–1.02) 0.98 (0.94–1.03)
Wealth index
 Poorest (Ref)
 Poorer 1.10 (1.06–1.15)*** 1.08 (1.04–1.13)***
 Middle 1.26 (1.21–1.33)*** 1.23 (1.17–1.29)***
 Richer 1.40 (1.33–1.47)*** 1.35 (1.28–1.42)***
 Richest 1.64 (1.54–1.74)*** 1.58 (1.47–1.70)***
Media exposure
 No (Ref)
 Yes 1.08 (1.04–1.12)*** 1.08 (1.04–1.12)***
Household Head
 Male (Ref)
 Female 1.02 (0.98–1.05) 1.02 (0.98–1.06)
Family size
  < 5 (Ref)
 5 +  0.97 (0.94–1.01) 0.97 (0.94–1.01)
Parity
 No child (Ref)
 1–2 0.96 (0.90–1.02) 0.96 (0.90–1.02)
 3–4 0.89 (0.83–0.96)** 0.90 (0.83–0.96)**
 5 +  0.74 (0.69–0.81)*** 0.75 (0.69–0.81)***
HIV test
 No (Ref)
 Yes 2.53 (2.43–2.64)*** 2.51 (2.40–2.62)***
Religion
 Christian (Ref)
 Muslim 0.82 (0.78–0.86)*** 0.83 (0.78–0.87)***
 Others 0.75 (0.67–0.83)*** 0.76 (0.68–0.85)***
 No religion 0.59 (0.53–0.66)*** 0.61 (0.54–0.68)***
Distance to health facility
 Serious problem (ref)
 Not a serious problem 0.80 (0.77–0.83)*** 0.85 (0.82–0.89)***
Place of residence
 Urban (Ref)
 Rural 1.15 (1.07–1.23)*** 1.27 (1.19–1.37)***
Community literacy level
 Low (Ref)
 Medium 1.16 (1.09–1.24)*** 0.99 (0.93–1.05)
 High 1.53 (1.41–1.65)*** 1.06 (0.99–1.14)
Community socioeconomic status
 Low (Ref)
 Medium 1.52 (1.41–1.64)*** 1.20 (1.12–1.28)***
 High 1.67 (1.53–1.82)*** 1.13 (1.04–1.23)**
Random effect result
 PSU variance (95% CI) 0.37 ( 0.32–0.44) 0.08 (0.06–0.10) 0.20 (0.16–0.26) 0.08 (0.07–0.10)
 ICC 0.12 0.01 0.04 0.01
 LR Test 2716.28 564.05 1163.22 590.36
 Wald chi-square and p-value reference χ2 = 6784.69, p < 0.001 χ2 = 958.28, p < 0.001 χ2 = 7276.32, p < 0.001
Model fitness
 Log-likelihood -124,703.32 -98,637.87 -115,532.46 -98,368.19
 AIC 249,410.6 197,341.8 231,080.9 196,814.4
 N

p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; **p < 0.001

Ref reference category, AIC Akaike Information Criterion, PSU Primary Sampling Unit, N total observation, LR Likelihood Ratio, ICC Intra-class correlation coefficient