Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 6;13:36. doi: 10.1186/s40104-022-00686-3

Table 3.

Effects of MBA on vulva size of first-parity gilts when exposed to ZEAc

Pregnant days Vulva size, mmd Pooled SEMe P-value
CO COA MO MOA Main effect of ZEA Main effect of MBA ZEA × MBA
0 11.47 12.26 11.68 12.08 0.714 0.962 0.838 0.473
7 10.10 10.06 11.10 11.88 0.337 0.171 0.305 0.169
14 9.48 9.55 10.08 9.90 0.507 0.841 0.664 0.484
21 9.61 9.33 10.66 9.64 0.408 0.891 0.949 0.649
28 9.68a 10.63ab 11.59b 10.38ab 0.412 0.016 0.035 <  0.01
35 9.99a 10.69ab 11.37b 10.70ab 0.285 0.063 0.131 <  0.01
42 10.74 10.45 11.37 10.72 0.432 0.603 0.591 0.245
49 10.81 10.49 12.04 11.21 0.492 0.220 0.182 0.065
56 10.55 10.47 11.87 11.02 0.406 0.223 0.317 0.121
63 10.97 10.72 11.47 11.12 0.532 0.721 0.816 0.396
70 11.38 11.12 12.78 11.80 0.656 0.287 0.344 0.135
77 12.59 12.65 13.01 12.71 0.472 0.905 0.973 0.698
84 12.92 12.66 14.35 13.94 0.482 0.159 0.263 0.122
91 16.71 16.84 18.13 16.84 0.855 0.711 0.832 0.482
98 19.59a 20.23ab 25.76b 21.79ab 1.316 0.064 0.116 <  0.01

a,b Mean values within a row without a common superscript differ significantly (P <  0.05)

c Means represent 20 replications per treatment (n = 20/group)

d CO, a positive basal control diet contained 60.52% normal corn; COA, CO + 2 g MBA/kg diet; 3) MO, a negative basal control diet contained 60.52% moldy corn; MOA, MO + 2 g MBA/kg diet; ZEA Zearalenone, MBA Mycotoxin biodegradation agent

e Pooled standard error of the means