Figure 6.

Impact of retrieval success on retrieval state evidence. A, We derived retrieval success and retrieval failure templates from hit and miss trials during the recognition phase. Each panel shows an across-subject electrode-frequency spectrogram of z-power during retrieval success (hits; left) and retrieval failure (misses; right) in which red represents z-power increases and blue represents z-power decreases. B, We assessed average retrieval status label as a function of instruction (orange represents encode; teal represents retrieve) and distance (near, far). We find a significant main effect of distance (p = 0.0018) driven by greater assignment of retrieval success for near compared with far trials. C, We assessed retrieval state evidence as a function of distance (solid line represents near; dashed line represents far) and retrieval status (red represents success; blue represents failure). We find a significant interaction between distance and time interval (p = 0.0010) driven by greater retrieval evidence on near compared with far trials early in the stimulus interval. Error bars indicate SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, uncorrected.