Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 31;10(1):e11. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1471

Table 2.

Risk of bias assessment of included studies

Study Q1 Q2 Q3* Q4 Q5 Q6* Q7* Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11* Q12 Q13* Q14 Overall
Cohort studies according to NHLBI tool
Arabi, 2017 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes No Yes NA Yes NR CD NA High risk
Arabi, 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes NA Yes NR CD NA High risk
Biglari, 2016 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes NA Yes NR CD NA High risk
Burke, 2019 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes CD Yes Yes NA Yes NR CD NA High risk
Dobran, 2015 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes No Yes NA Yes NR Yes NA Some concern
Gaebler., 1999 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes NA Yes NR Yes NA Some concern
Grassner, 2016 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes NA Yes NR Yes NA Some concern
Jug, 2015 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes NA Yes Yes Yes NA Low risk
Lee, 2018 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes No Yes NA Yes NR Yes NA Some concern
Mattiassich, 2017 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes NA Yes NR Yes NA Some concern
McCarthy, 2011 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes No Yes NA Yes NR Yes NA Some concern
Nagata, 2016 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes No Yes NA Yes NR CD NA High risk
Nasi, 2019 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes NA Yes NR Yes NA Some concern
Tsuji, 2019 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes CD Yes Yes NA Yes NR Yes NA High risk
Wutte, 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes NR Yes Yes Yes Yes NA Yes Yes Yes NA Low risk
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5
Clinical trial according Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool
Cengiz, 2008 Low Low Low Low Low -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Low risk

Q: Signaling question; D: Domain; NR: Not reported; NA: Not applicable; CD: Cannot determine.

*, Any concern in these questions were considered as fetal error.