Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 29;45(4):187–193. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000417

TABLE 3.

Comparison of Baseline Information Between 2 JAK1/2 Status

n (%)
JAK1/2 Wild JAK1/2 Mutated P
Age (y) 0.42
 ≤40 14 (51.9) 6 (75.0)
 >40 13 (48.1) 2 (25.0)
Sex 1.00
 Male 21 (77.8) 7 (87.5)
 Female 6 (22.2) 1 (12.5)
Adenocarcinoma 0.70
 Yes 10 (37.0) 4 (50.0)
 No 17 (63.0) 4 (50.0)
Lynch syndrome 1.00
 Lynch 19 (70.4) 6 (75.0)
 Sporadic 8 (29.6) 2 (25.0)
TMB>20 0.009
 No 0 (0.0) 3 (37.5)
 Yes 27 (100.0) 5 (62.5)
Tumor location 1.000
 Left-sided 16 (59.3) 5 (62.5)
 Right-sided 11 (40.7) 3 (37.5)
RAS mutation 0.42
 Wild-type 13 (48.1) 2 (25.0)
 Mutant-type 14 (51.9) 6 (75.0)
PIK3CA mutation 0.44
 Wild-type 12 (44.4) 5 (62.5)
 Mutant-type 15 (55.6) 3 (37.5)
Clinical response 0.032
 CR_PR 15 (55.6) 8 (100.0)
 SD_PD 12 (44.4) 0 (0.0)

Bold values are statistically significant at P<0.05.

CR indicates complete response; JAK1/2, Janus kinases 1 and 2; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; TMB, tumor mutational burden.