Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Jul 2;27(10):869.e1–869.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.06.030

Table 3.

Multivariable Logistic Regression of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) including Social Vulnerability Index, Model 2 (HCT cohort= 146, No HCT cohort = 526)

Parameter DF Estimate Odds Ratio (95% CI) Pr > ChiSq Type III p-value
Intercept 1 2.1646 <.0001
Age 1 −0.0375 0.963 (0.947-0.979) <.0001 <0.001
Sex
   Female (reference)
   Male 1 0.00874 1.009 (0.678-1.501) 0.9656 0.966
Region 0.015
   Northern (reference)
   Central/Valley 1 0.3771 1.458 (0.834-2.548) 0.1855
   Hampton Roads 1 −0.3622 0.696 (0.385-1.259) 0.2309
   Richmond/Eastern 1 −0.6818 0.506 (0.265-0.964) 0.0383
   Southside/Southwest 1 −0.2582 0.772 (0.348-1.713) 0.5253
Marital Status 0.019
   Married (reference)
   Not Married 1 −0.5343 0.586 (0.375-0.915) 0.0188
Year of Diagnosis 0.724
   2013 1 −0.3381 0.713 (0.377-1.349) 0.2986
   2014 1 −0.3370 0.714 (0.383-1.331) 0.2893
   2015 1 −0.0396 0.961 (0.526-1.757) 0.8975
   2016 1 −0.0961 0.908 (0.486-1.699) 0.7637
   2017 (reference)
Primary Payer <0.001
   Private Insurance (reference)
   Government Sponsored 1 −0.7792 0.459 (0.291-0.723) 0.0008
Overall Social Vulnerability Index a 1 −0.9936 0.370 (0.166-0.824) 0.0150 0.015

Note: Excluded patients with unknown Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), sex, insurance, and marital status for analysis; not insured patients were also excluded due to small numbers. CI: Confidence Interval

a

Using the CDC’s Social Vulnerability Index from the 2016 census tract download