Table 5.
Past-month monetary gambling by type and past-month skin gambling predicting problem gambling
| Variables | Advertisements Sample Problem Gambling NG/NPG vs AR/PG1 (ref = NG/NPG) |
Qualtrics Sample Problem Gambling NG/NP vs AR/PG1 (ref = NG/NPG) |
||||||||
| B | SE | Wald's χ 2 | P | Odds ratio | B | SE | Wald's χ 2 | P | Odds ratio | |
| Monetary gambling | ||||||||||
| Poker machines | 3.553 | 0.726 | 23.952 | <0.001*** | 34.935 | 1.443 | 0.485 | 8.846 | 0.003** | 4.234 |
| Horse/greyhound racing | -0.110 | 1.216 | 0.008 | 0.928 | 1.116 | 0.600 | 0.464 | 1.670 | 0.196 | 1.822 |
| Scratchies, lottery, lotto, pools | 2.536 | 0.599 | 17.950 | <0.001*** | 12.634 | 0.830 | 0.284 | 8.553 | 0.003** | 2.293 |
| Keno | 2.740 | 1.358 | 4.072 | 0.044* | 15.479 | 0.281 | 0.507 | 0.308 | 0.579 | 1.325 |
| Bingo | 3.653 | 0.848 | 18.610 | <0.001*** | 38.708 | 0.549 | 0.386 | 2.029 | 0.154 | 1.732 |
| Poker | 0.870 | 1.606 | 0.294 | 0.588 | 2.114 | 1.717 | 0.681 | 6.361 | 0.012* | 5.568 |
| Casino table games3 | - | - | - | - | -0.529 | 0.740 | 0.510 | 0.475 | 0.589 | |
| Sporting events | -1.208 | 1.043 | 1.341 | 0.247 | 0.299 | 0.663 | 0.480 | 1.913 | 0.167 | 1.942 |
| Esports | 1.665 | 0.669 | 6.192 | 0.013* | 5.285 | -0.188 | 0.433 | 0.189 | 0.664 | 0.829 |
| Fantasy sports | 2.990 | 0.661 | 20.450 | <0.001*** | 19.891 | 0.764 | 0.501 | 2.323 | 0.127 | 2.146 |
| Informal private betting | 2.782 | 0.500 | 30.989 | <0.001*** | 16.154 | 0.777 | 0.307 | 6.430 | 0.011* | 2.175 |
| Skin gambling | 2.730 | 0.476 | 32.84 | <0.001*** | 15.333 | 2.202 | 0.237 | 86.218 | <0.001*** | 9.047 |
| Constant | -4.580 | 0.459 | 99.776 | <0.001*** | 0.010 | -2.590 | 0.156 | 274.633 | <0.001*** | 0.075 |
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
1. Two problem gambling categories: NG/NPG = Non-Gamblers plus Non-Problem-Gamblers; AR/PG = At-risk gamblers plus PG = Problem Gamblers.
2. Omnibus test of final model: advertisement sample (Block: Likelihood χ 2 = 37.049; df = 1; P < 0.001***; Model: Likelihood Ratio χ 2 = 987.395; df = 11; P < 0.001***); Qualtrics sample (Block: Likelihood χ 2 = 11.083; df = 1; P = 0.001**; Model: Likelihood Ratio χ 2 = 288.518; df = 12; P = 0.001**).
3. Sample size for the casino table games category was too small for this analysis.