Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 7;50(4):743–776. doi: 10.1007/s11747-022-00855-w

Table 4.

Mediation analyses (main study)

Detailedness Mediator Response a (IV ➔ MV) b (MV ➔ DV) c (IV ➔ DV) c’ (IV ➔ DV) a*b
b t p b t p b t p b t p b LLCI ULCI
Detailed Perceived comprehensiveness Image −.402 −2.216 .029 .415 4.741 <.001 −.362 −2.009 .047 −.195 −1.160 .249 −.167 −.372 −.017 *
Purchase Intention .257 2.617 .010 −.442 −2.334 .021 −.339 −1.796 .075 −.103 −.265 .005 †
Perceived credibility Image −.218 −1.237 .219 .406 4.464 <.001 −.362 −2.009 .047 −.273 −1.634 .105 −.089 −.246 .054
Purchase Intention .295 2.948 .004 −.442 −2.334 .021 −.377 −2.049 .043 −.063 −.182 .040
Perceived complexity Image −.516 −2.736 .007 −.022 −.236 .814 −.362 −2.009 .047 −.373 −1.994 .049 .011 −.097 .149
Purchase Intention −.064 −.658 .512 −.442 −2.334 .021 −.475 −2.419 .017 .033 −.077 .177
Perceived user friendliness Image .170 .405 .405 .317 4.182 <.001 −.362 −2.009 .047 −.397 −2.489 .014 .057 −.073 .199
Purchase Intention .352 4.310 <.001 −.442 −2.334 .021 −.492 −2.858 .005 .061 −.076 .216
Nondetailed Perceived comprehensiveness Image −.298 −1.722 .088 .197 1.760 .081 .295 1.467 .145 .353 1.752 .083 −.059 −.189 .025
Purchase Intention .248 2.273 .025 .299 1.506 .135 .373 1.891 .061 −.074 −.183 .017
Perceived credibility Image .378 2.083 .040 .587 6.379 <.001 .295 1.467 .145 .073 .416 .678 .222 .032 .436 *
Purchase Intention .272 2.625 .010 .299 1.506 .135 .196 .993 .323 .103 .005 .246 *
Perceived complexity Image −.062 −.362 .718 −.232 2.190 .031 .295 1.467 .145 .279 1.415 .160 .015 −.070 .140
Purchase Intention −.043 −.380 .705 .299 1.506 .135 .296 1.485 .141 .003 −.044 .056
Perceived user friendliness Image .512 3.100 .002 .232 2.089 .039 ..295 1.467 .145 .161 .821 .413 .125 −.010 .334 †
Purchase Intention .119 1.039 .301 .299 1.506 .135 .231 1.141 .257 .062 −.063 .214

Mediation analyses with PROCESS (model 4, each mediator tested separately), b = unstandardized coefficients; all variables centralized, IV = controllability. Included control variables: gender, age, device experience, product category knowledge, sustainability attitude. a: regression of the mediator on controllability in a single linear regression analysis; b: regression of DV on the mediator in a multiple regression analysis; c: regression of DV on controllability in a single linear regression analysis; c’: regression of DV on controllability in a multiple regression analysis; a*b: indirect effect; *Bootstrapping (CI-95%, 5000 samples): LLCI: lower limit, ULCI: upper limit. †Bootstrapping with CI-90% applied to test for the p < .10-level