Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 7;50(4):743–776. doi: 10.1007/s11747-022-00855-w

Table 9.

Overview of studies

ARPI control ARPI content ARPI context Consumer processing Response Design
device other media rush hour comprehen. interaction quality location N product
Pre-study 1a no ARPI / uncontrollable nondetailed glasses CG utilitarian / hedonic benefit purchase intention web 469 cereals
Pre-study 2a no ARPI / uncontrollable detailed tablet, glasses QR, CG utilitarian / hedonic benefit brand image, purchase intention web 308 cereal bars
Pre-study 3a controllability demonstrate detailed tablet QR utilitarian / hedonic benefit, presence, information-product-fit brand image, purchase intention web 260 cereals
Main study uncontrollable / controllableb nondetailed / detailed tablet booklet relaxed / rush hour comprehensiveness complexity, user friendliness, credibility brand image, purchase intention purchasese field 403 cereals
Follow-up 1 no ARPI / controllableb,c,d detailed tablet CG comprehensiveness brand image, purchase intention choicef web 310 cereal bars
Follow-up 2 no ARPI / uncontrollable / controllabled nondetailed / detailed glasses CG comprehensiveness complexity, user friendliness, credibility, presence, novelty, utilitarian / hedonic benefit brand image, purchase intention choicef web 420 cereals
Follow-up 3 no ARPI / controllableb detailed tablet CG relaxed / rush hour scannerg field 51 beer
Follow-up 4 not manipulated not manipulated tablet manipulated (relaxed / rush hour) comprehensiveness willingness to pay lab 133 fashion

aPre-studies are reported in the Web-Appendix A. controllability: b multiple rounds with exit, c multiple rounds without exit, d one round. Other media: CG = control group without ARPI. Response: eself-reported purchases, fpreference over competing brand, gcheck-out scanner data of purchases. Location: field: ARPI-tablet in hypermarket, web: online-experiment showing ARPI video from a first-person perspective