Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 24;13:791001. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.791001

Table 3.

Generalized structural equations model analysis showing relationship of socio-demographic and clinical factors with sexual dysfunction among the respondents.

Desire Excitement Erection/lubrication Orgasm Orgasmic satisfaction Overall sexual dysfunction
Coef. (95% CI) p -value Coef. (95% CI) p -value Coef. (95% CI) p -value Coef. (95% CI) p -value Coef. (95% CI) p -value Coef. (95% CI) p -value
Depressiona 0.09 (−0.03, 0.22) 0.138 0.13 (−0.01, 0.26) 0.075 0.19 (0.06, 0.32) 0.003 0.45 (0.19, 0.71) 0.001 0.58 (0.35, 0.81) 0.000 0.30 (0.14, 0.46) 0.000
Anxietya −0.10 (0.23, 0.03) 0.146 −0.10 (−0.22, 0.02) 0.100 −0.10 (−0.21, 0.01) 0.071 0.04 (−0.17, 0.26) 0.689 0.28 (0.09, 0.47) 0.005 0.02 (−0.14, 0.17) 0.834
Stressa 0.13 (−0.03, 0.29) 0.113 0.07 (−0.10, 0.24) 0.399 0.05 (−0.12, 0.22) 0.549 −0.05 (−0.31, 0.22) 0.727 0.07 (−0.21, 0.34) 0.636 −0.03 (−0.24, 0.18) 0.783
Ageb 0.05 (0.04, 0.06) 0.000 0.04 (0.02, 0.05) 0.000 0.04 (0.03, 0.06) 0.000 0.04 (0.02, 0.06) 0.001 0.04 (0.02, 0.06) 0.000 0.05 (0.03, 0.06) 0.000
Sexc 0.42 (0.13, 0.71) 0.004 0.94 (0.61, 1.26) 0.000 1.33 (1.03, 1.63) 0.000 2.07 (1.64, 2.50) 0.000 0.83 (0.36, 1.31) 0.001 0.87 (0.51, 1.23) 0.000
Marital statusd 0.55 (0.79, –0.32) 0.000 0.58 (0.84, –0.32) 0.000 0.39 (0.67, –0.12) 0.005 −0.19 (−0.72, 0.33) 0.472 0.00 (−0.58, 0.58) 0.996 −0.28 (−0.61, 0.05) 0.096
Presence of comorbiditiesc 0.16 (−0.11, 0.43) 0.244 0.25 (−0.05, 0.55) 0.103 0.53 (0.22, 0.84) 0.001 0.24 (−0.12, 0.59) 0.188 0.32 (−0.08, 0.71) 0.122 0.43 (0.13, 0.73) 0.005
Smoking statusc 0.19 (−0.03, 0.40) 0.094 −0.05 (−0.28, 0.18) 0.679 −0.24 (−0.47, −0.01) 0.040 −0.17 (−0.48, 0.13) 0.267 −0.25 (−0.56, 0.06) 0.120 −0.22 (−0.50, 0.06) 0.120

Coef., coefficient of regression equations; CI, confidence interval.

a

Probit linkage used for ordinal level of measurement for these variables with assumption of homogeneity of risk. The reference categories for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress are the “Normal” groups.

b

Age was taken in a continuous scale of measurement assuming Gaussian distribution and using identity linkage.

c

These variables were measured dichotomously. For sex, “male” was the reference category, while in the case of presence of comorbidities, and smoking status the reference categories were “absence of any comorbidity” and “non-smoker”, respectively.

d

For marital status, Divorced, Separated, and Widow categories were merged into “previously married” category yielding three nominal level categories, viz., unmarried, currently married, and previously married. For this variable, also uniformity of risk was assumed, and the coefficient was calculated taking the “Unmarried” group as reference.

The bold values indicate statistically significant.