Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 24;46(2):165–180. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0377

Table 2.

Remission rates of T2DM after metabolic surgery confirmed by randomized clinical trials

Patients Type Number Follow-up, yr Weight-loss End-point Outcome
Dixon et al. [31] T2DM within 2 years BMI 30–40 kg/m2 AGB vs. conventional therapy 30 vs. 30 2 20.7% vs. 1.4% HbA1c <6.2% 73% vs. 13%
Ding et al. [32] T2DM BMI 30–45 kg/m2 AGB vs. ILMI 23 vs. 22 1 13.5 kg vs. 8.5 kg HbA1c <6.5%a 33% vs. 23%
Courcoulas et al. [33] T2DM BMI 30–40 kg/m2 RYGB vs. AGB vs. ILMI 21 vs. 20 vs. 20 1 27.0% vs. 17.3% vs. 10.2% HbA1c <5.7% 27% vs. 23% vs. 0%
Schauer et al. [34] T2DM BMI 27–43 kg/m2 RYGB vs. SG vs. ILMI 50 vs. 50 vs. 50 1 29.4 kg vs. 25.1 kg vs. 5.4 kg HbA1c <6.0% 42% vs. 37% vs. 12%
Ikramuddin et al. [35] T2DM BMI 30–40 kg/m2 RYGB vs. ILMI 60 vs. 60 1 26.1% vs. 7.9% HbA1c <7.0% 49% vs. 19%
Halperin et al. [36] T2DM within 1 year BMI 30–42 kg/m2 RYGB vs. ILMI 19 vs. 19 1 5.1 kg vs. 1.4 kg HbA1c <6.5% 58% vs. 16%
Cummings et al. [37] T2DM BMI 30–45 kg/m2 RYGB vs. ILMI 23 vs. 20 1 25.8% vs. 6.4% HbA1c <6.0% 60% vs. 6%
Mingrone et al. [38] T2DM over 5 years BMI over 35 kg/m2 BPD vs. RYGB vs. ILMI 20 vs. 20 vs. 20 2 33.8% vs. 33.3% vs. 4.7% HbA1c <6.5% 95% vs. 75% vs. 0%

T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index; AGB, adjustable gastric band; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; ILMI, intensive lifestyle and medical intervention; RYGB, Roun-en-Y gastric bypass; SG, sleeve gastrectomy; BPD, bilopancreatic diversion.

a

On or off medication.