TABLE 3.

P values obtained from a two-way ANOVA on animal weight (Figure 9C).

	Week 1	Week 6	Week 10	Week 14	Week 18	Week 22
WT vs. Tg +	0.008086	4.15E-06	1.07E-06	2.23E-08	1.74E-08	7.95E-10
	**	***	***	***	***	***
WT vs. Tg-	0.989668	0.74143	0.448772	0.894038	0.785077	0.830688
	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.
Tg + vs. Tg-	0.010103	0.000138	1.94E-05	1.19E-05	2.05E-05	4.63E-07
	*	***	***	***	***	***
Tg + vs. PGK low	0.071372	0.47456	0.248032	0.034477	0.903198	0.750925
	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.
Tg + vs. PGK half	0.002171	0.017568	0.019533	0.00563	0.010417	3.05E-06
	**	*	*	*	*	***
Tg + vs. PGK high	0.015524	0.414668	0.657465	0.07893	-	-
	*	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	-

Significance was set at *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.0001.