TABLE 4.
P values obtained from a two-way ANOVA on animal behavior (Figure 9D).
| Week 6 | Week 10 | Week 14 | Week 18 | Week 22 | |
| WT and Tg + | 0.03800095 | 2.53E-06 | 2.09E-11 | 2.13E-19 | 4.38E-20 |
| ** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| PGK half vs. Tg- | 0.69854339 | 3.14E-06 | 1.63E-07 | 4.92E-10 | 1.92E-14 |
| *** | *** | *** | *** | ||
| PGK low vs. Tq- | 4.32E-06 | 5.15E-09 | 9.89E-11 | 4.17E-12 | 2.08E-17 |
| *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Tg + vs. Tg- | 0.61480229 | 0.000697121 | 9.44E-09 | 4.41E-15 | 1.00E-20 |
| ** | *** | *** | *** | ||
| PGK low vs. Tg + | 0.00013403 | 0.005592562 | 0.08977842 | 0.899492814 | 0.46909738 |
| *** | ** | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| PGK half vs. Tg + | 0.98245877 | 0.051405024 | 0.23053219 | 0.399584418 | 0.00311152 |
| n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ** | |
| WT vs. Tg- | 0.26381014 | 0.493564981 | 0.52770667 | 0.232862104 | 0.89209696 |
| n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| PGK high vs. Tg- | 4.43E-08 | 3.33E-07 | 6.72E-13 | – | – |
| *** | *** | *** | – | – | |
| PGK high vs. Tg + | 2.70E-06 | 0.009980835 | 0.16122373 | – | – |
| *** | ** | n.s. | – | – |
Significance was set at *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.0001.