Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: Women Health. 2020 Apr 6;60(7):806–820. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2020.1746951

Table 3.

Multivariable ordinal logistic regression models of abortion attitudes in the case of fetal anomaly and in the case of poverty as predicted by gender role attitudes in 2008.

Fetal Anomaly (N = 2,847) F = 6.67, p < .001 Poverty (N = 2,850) F = 6.69, p < .001


OR p SE OR p SE

Egalitarian attitudes toward working women 1.00 .904 0.02 0.99 .510 0.02
Egalitarian attitudes toward motherhood 1.09 .01 0.04 1.02 .641 0.04
Religiosity (Reference: Less than several times a year)
 Several Times a Year 0.97 .884 0.19 1.12 .658 0.28
 1–3 Times per Month 1.36 .116 0.26 1.06 .802 0.25
 Once a Week or More 0.95 .79 0.17 0.81 .312 0.17
Premarital Sex Attitudes (Reference: Always Wrong)
 Almost Always Wrong 1.91 <.001 0.32 2.66 <.001 0.66
 Wrong Only Sometimes 2.86 <.001 0.39 3.29 <.001 0.59
 Not Wrong At All 2.38 <.001 0.35 3.59 <.001 0.61
Preferential Hiring and Promotion for Women Attitudes (Reference: Disagree/Strongly Disagree)
 Neutral 1.13 .524 0.22 1.11 .69 0.28
 Agree/Strongly Agree 0.89 .512 0.15 1.20 .462 0.29

models also control for gender, race/ethnicity, education, household income, age, urbanicity, religious denomination, political identity, marital status, attitudes toward income inequality, and province of residence; significantly higher odds italicized and bolded.