Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD006268. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006268.pub2

Roseveare 1998.

Methods Single center, randomised, controlled trial 
 1) Allocation concealment: Unclear/Not stated 
 2) Blinding of patients: No 
 3) Blinding of outcome assessors: No 
 4) A priori calculation of sample size: Unclear/Not stated 
 5) Groups treated identical other than the named intervention: Yes
Participants Number of eligible patients: 86 
 Number of patients enrolled: 66 
 Drop outs/Withdrawals: 0 
 Incl. Criteria: Consecutive patients undergoing routine day‐case colonoscopy 
 Excl. Criteria: 1) Age less than 18 years 2) Severe pre‐existing cardiovascular or respiratory disease 3) Those felt to be unable to use the PCS system 
 Country: UK 
 Setting: Outpatient 
 Age(median(range) )(yrs): Group A: 50 52 (23‐74) Group B: (29‐73) 
 N (%) males: Not stated 
 ASA score: Not stated 
 Groups comparable at baseline: Yes (age, body weight, performance of pre‐procedure number connection test)
Interventions Group A (n=33): PCS Propofol (Median dose: 105 mg) and Alfentanil (Median dose: 0.13 mg) 
 Group B (n=33): Diazemul (Median (range) dose: 15 (10‐20) mg) and Pethidine: single bolus dose of 50 mg 
 Mode of administration: Group A: PCS boluses Group B: single bolus at beginning of procedure 
 Administered by: Group A: PCS Group B: endoscopist; All patients monitored by anaesthetists 
 Goal level of sedation: Group A (PCS): relieve any discomfort Group B: Not stated 
 All received supplemental oxygen (2 L/min) through nasal cannula
Outcomes Procedure time, patients' level of sedation, pain, complications, recovery time, patient satisfaction
Notes Definitions: 
 1) Patients' level of sedation, measured by a single nurse specialist during the procedure on a 5 point scale 
 2) Pain score: Patients' recollection, after recovery on a 4 point scale (also measured by a single nurse specialist during the procedure) 
 3) Recovery time: measured by comparison of number connection tests (NCTs) completed at 10‐min intervals after completion of the procedure with the NCT undertaken prior to sedation. 
 4) Complications: Maximum fall in systolic blood pressure, difference in O2 saturation, O2 desaturation less than 95% 
 5) Overall patient satisfaction: not defined