Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 5;2(1):13–23. doi: 10.1002/bco2.60

TABLE 3.

T stage distribution for DAC and AAC

Study Tumour type Total cases T1 (%) T2 (%) T3 (%) T4 (%)
Wu et al, 201740 DAC 511 103 (20.2) 213 (41.0) 115 (22.5) 54 (10.6)
AAC 3303 446 (13.5) 2256 (68.3) 522 (15.8) 47 (1.4)
Kim et al, 201555 DAC 29 16 (55.2) 6 (20.7) 7 (24.1)
AAC 116 68 (56.6) 24 (19.9) 28 (23.3)
Tarjan et al, 201229 DAC 13 1 (8.0) 1 (8.0) 10 (76.0) 1 (8.0)
AAC 97 49 (51.0) 22 (23.0) 26 (27.0) 0 (0.0)
Meeks et al, 20129 DAC 293 43 (14.7) 110 (38.0) 89 (30.3)
AAC 257 875 77 390 (30.0) 123 919 (48.0) 47 024 (18.0)
Morgan et al, 20107 DAC 324 130 (40.0) 155 (48.0) 39 (12.0)
AAC 414 587 187 893 (45.0) 214 110 (52.0) 12 584 (3.0)
Total DAC 1170 293(25.0) 485 (41.5) 260 (22.2) 55 (10.5)
AAC 675 978 265 846 (39.3) 340 331 (50.4) 60 184 (8.9) 47 (1.4)
RR 0.88 (0.80‐0.97) 0.74 (0.69‐0.79) 1.71 (1.53‐1.91) 7.56 (5.19‐11.01)
P value P = .01 P < .00001 P < .00001 P < .00001