TABLE 4.

Performance comparison of different deep learning models on the A. thaliana, C. elegans, and D. melanogaster datasets.

Model	ACC (%)	F-value (%)	Recall (%)	PRE (%)	MCC
A. thaliana
CNN	83.6	83.7	84.2	83.3	0.673
RNN	85.0	85.1	86.6	83.7	0.701
CNN-RNN	83.9	84.3	86.1	83.9	0.678
C. elegans
CNN	89.1	89.3	90.8	87.8	0.782
RNN	89.3	89.7	93.1	86.5	0.788
CNN-RNN	89.0	89.4	92.3	86.5	0.783
D. melanogaster
CNN	86.0	86.1	87.2	85.1	0.720
RNN	85.9	85.8	87.1	84.8	0.720
CNN-RNN	86.8	87.0	88.7	85.3	0.736

The bold values highlight the best methods of the species (i.e., A. thaliana, C. elegans, and D. melanogaster).