Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 15;13:843425. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.843425

TABLE 7.

Performance comparison of DeepDNA4mC and other five exiting predictors.

Species Predictors ACC (%) Recall (%) MCC
A. thaliana iDNA4mc 76.1 76.6 0.520
4mcPred 76.8 75.5 0.536
4mcPred_SVM 78.7 77.8 0.573
4mcPred_IFL 82.2 80.3 0.644
Deep4mcPred 84.4 86.0 0.689
DeepDNA4mC 83.9 84.0 0.678
C. elegans iDNA4mc 78.0 79.0 0.560
4mcPred 82.6 82.5 0.652
4mcPred_SVM 81.5 82.4 0.631
4mcPred_IFL 88.0 89.0 0.761
Deep4mcPred 89.3 91.5 0.787
DeepDNA4mC 89.4 90.3 0.789
D. melanogaster iDNA4mc 81.2 83.3 0.620
4mcPred 82.2 82.4 0.646
4mcPred_SVM 83.0 83.8 0.661
4mcPred_IFL 87.3 86.5 0.745
Deep4mcPred 87.1 87.6 0.742
DeepDNA4mC 87.4 89.6 0.749

The bold values highlight the best methods of the species (i.e., A. thaliana, C. elegans, and D. melanogaster).