TABLE 7.
Performance comparison of DeepDNA4mC and other five exiting predictors.
Species | Predictors | ACC (%) | Recall (%) | MCC |
A. thaliana | iDNA4mc | 76.1 | 76.6 | 0.520 |
4mcPred | 76.8 | 75.5 | 0.536 | |
4mcPred_SVM | 78.7 | 77.8 | 0.573 | |
4mcPred_IFL | 82.2 | 80.3 | 0.644 | |
Deep4mcPred | 84.4 | 86.0 | 0.689 | |
DeepDNA4mC | 83.9 | 84.0 | 0.678 | |
C. elegans | iDNA4mc | 78.0 | 79.0 | 0.560 |
4mcPred | 82.6 | 82.5 | 0.652 | |
4mcPred_SVM | 81.5 | 82.4 | 0.631 | |
4mcPred_IFL | 88.0 | 89.0 | 0.761 | |
Deep4mcPred | 89.3 | 91.5 | 0.787 | |
DeepDNA4mC | 89.4 | 90.3 | 0.789 | |
D. melanogaster | iDNA4mc | 81.2 | 83.3 | 0.620 |
4mcPred | 82.2 | 82.4 | 0.646 | |
4mcPred_SVM | 83.0 | 83.8 | 0.661 | |
4mcPred_IFL | 87.3 | 86.5 | 0.745 | |
Deep4mcPred | 87.1 | 87.6 | 0.742 | |
DeepDNA4mC | 87.4 | 89.6 | 0.749 |
The bold values highlight the best methods of the species (i.e., A. thaliana, C. elegans, and D. melanogaster).