Skip to main content
. 2000 Jun;44(6):1438–1442. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.6.1438-1442.2000

TABLE 2.

Results of IEF, genotyping of β-lactamases, plasmid analysis, and PFGE

Resistance phenotype group and strain Clinical isolate
Transconjugantc
pI(s) SHV TEM AmpC Plasmid profile PFGE pattern pI SHV AmpC Approx plasmid size (kb)
Group I
 X386 8.2, 7.6 5 A I 8.2 5 100
 C097 8.2, 7.6, 5.4 5 1 B II 8.2 5 100
 Q381 8.2, 7.6, 5.4 5 1 C III 8.2 5 70
 T923a 8.2, 7.6, 5.4 5 1 D IV
 T386 8.2, 7.6, 5.4 12 1 E V 8.2 12 70
 R436 8.2, 7.6, 5.4 12 1 E VI 8.2 12 100
 S276 8.2, 7.6, 5.4 12 1 F VII 8.2 12 100
 T986 8.2, 7.6, 5.4 12 1 G VIII 8.2 12 70
 B262a 8.2, 7.6, 5.4 12 1 H IX
 T255a 8.2, 7.6, 5.4 12 1 I X
 V293 8.2, 7.6, 5.4 12 1 G XI 8.2 12 70
 D155 8.2, 7.6 12 J XII 8.2 12 40
 B657 8.2, 7.6 12 K XIII 8.2 12 75
 C106 8.2, 7.6 12 J XIV 8.2 12 40
Group II
 O574 8.3, 7.6, 5.4 11 1 L XV 8.3 95
 R549 8.3, 7.6, 5.4 11 1 M XVI 8.3 125
Group III
 W142 8.25, 7.6, 5.4 11 1 CMY-8 N XVII 8.25 CMY-8 25
 W580 8.25, 7.6, 5.4 11 1 CMY-8 N XVII 8.25 CMY-8 25
 T384 8.25, 7.6, 5.4 11 1 CMY-8 N XVII 8.25 CMY-8 25
Group IV
 O787 8.2, 7.6, 5.4 12 1 UDb O XVIII 8.2 12 UD 150
a

Conjugation experiments with strains T923, B262, and T255 were not successful. 

b

UD, undetermined. 

c

All transconjugates lacked TEM.