Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 10;42(4):309–318. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01137-7

Table 2.

Comparison of outcomes and endpoints between the study groups

Parameter 5 mg group [n = 25] 3 mg group [n = 25] p value
TRT, days [mean ± SD] 5.3 ± 2.0 6.6 ± 2.0 0.033a,c
Patients reached target INR in the first 3–5 days [n (%)] 14 (56) 7 (28) 0.080b
Proportion of time spent in therapeutic INR, % [median (IQR)] 38 (25–44) 29 (24–33) 0.091a
Number of INR readings > 4 [median (IQR)] 0.0 (0.0–2.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.5) 0.009a,c
Number of in-range readings [median (IQR)] 3 (2–4) 2 (2–3) 0.023a,c
Patients experienced major bleeding event [n (%)] 4 (16) 5 (20) 0.589b
Patients experienced minor bleeding event [n (%)] 11 (44) 5 (20) 0.022b,c
Patients experienced any bleeding event [n (%)] 13 (52) 8 (32) 0.094b
Total number of bleeding events [median (IQR)] 1 (0–2) 0 (0–1) 0.052a
Number of bridging days [median (IQR)] 3.0 (2.0–4.0) 6.0 (3.5–6.5) < 0.001a,c
Enoxaparin overall cost, USD [median (IQR)] 24.8 (16.5–35.6) 49.6 (30.8–57.5) 0.002a,c
Follow-up period, days [mean ± SD] 9.0 ± 2.8 8.6 ± 2.5 0.557a

TRT time required to reach the lower limit of therapeutic INR, INR international normalized ratio, IQR interquartile range, SD standard deviation

aAnalysis of covariance

bLogistic regression

cp value < 0.05: significant